On September 29, 2025, staff in the SEC’s Division of Investment Management issued no-action relief for certain crypto asset custodians. Specifically, the relief will, under certain circumstances, allow SEC-registered investment advisers (Registered Advisers), registered investment companies and business development companies (collectively, Regulated Funds) to treat a state-chartered trust company as a “bank” (for custody purposes) with respect to crypto assets and related cash or cash equivalents, without fear of enforcement under the SEC’s custody rules.
Under SEC rules, Registered Advisers and Regulated Funds generally must use a qualified custodian to hold client funds or securities. Certain banks are eligible to serve as qualified custodians. National banks, federal savings associations and state banks that are members of the Federal Reserve system are presumptively qualified custodians. A trust company chartered under state law permitted to exercise fiduciary powers (a State Trust Company), must, however, satisfy a number of objective and subjective conditions, including the requirement that “a substantial portion of its business must consist of receiving deposits or exercising fiduciary powers similar to those permitted to national banks under the authority of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.”
The number of institutions providing crypto asset custody services to Registered Advisers and Regulated Funds has not kept pace with market demand for various reasons, including uncertainty for State Trust Companies as to whether they satisfy the requirement of exercising fiduciary powers similar to national banks. The SEC sought public comment on this issue in 2020, but took no further regulatory action.
Under the SEC staff’s no-action letter, a Registered Adviser or Regulated Fund may treat a State Trust Company as a “bank” for custody purposes with respect to the placement and maintenance of Crypto Assets and Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents, provided that:
- Prior to engaging the State Trust Company, and on an annual basis, the Registered Adviser or Regulated Fund, as applicable, has a reasonable basis, after due inquiry, for believing that:
- the State Trust Company is authorized by the relevant State Banking Authority to provide custody services for Crypto Assets and Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents; and
- the State Trust Company maintains and implements written internal policies and procedures reasonably designed to safeguard Crypto Assets and Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents from the risk of theft, loss, misuse, and misappropriation, with such policies and procedures addressing, among other topics, private key management and cybersecurity. In making such a determination, the Registered Adviser or Regulated Fund:
- receives and reviews the State Trust Company’s most recent annual financial statements and confirms that such financial statements have been subject to an audit by an independent public accountant and have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP); and
- receives and reviews the State Trust Company’s most recent written internal control report prepared by an independent public accountant during the current or prior calendar year (e.g., SOC-1 report or SOC-2 report) and confirms that such internal control report contains an opinion of such independent public accountant that controls have been placed in operation as of a specific date and are suitably designed and are operating effectively to meet control objectives relating to custodial services, including the safeguarding of Crypto Assets and Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents during the year.
- The Registered Adviser or Regulated Fund, as applicable, enters into, or causes an RIA Client to enter into, as applicable, a written custodial services agreement with the State Trust Company, which provides that:
- the State Trust Company will not, directly or indirectly, lend, pledge, hypothecate, or rehypothecate any Crypto Assets (or Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents) held in custody for the RIA Client or Regulated Fund, as applicable, without the prior written consent of the RIA Client or Regulated Fund, and then only for the account of such RIA Client or Regulated Fund; and
- all Crypto Assets (and Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents) held in custody for the RIA Client or Regulated Fund, as applicable, will be segregated from the State Trust Company’s assets.
- The Registered Adviser discloses to its RIA Clients (in the case of a Registered Adviser) or the Regulated Fund discloses to the members of its board of directors or trustees (in the case of a Regulated Fund, as applicable) any material risks associated with using State Trust Companies as custodians of Crypto Assets (and Related Cash and/or Cash Equivalents).
- The Registered Adviser (with respect to an RIA Client) or the Regulated Fund (and, as applicable, its board of directors or trustees), reasonably determines that the use of the State Trust Company’s custody services is in the best interest of the RIA Client or Regulated Fund and its shareholders, as applicable.
For these purposes:
“Cash and/or Cash Equivalents” refers to cash and/or cash equivalents reasonably necessary to effect transactions in Crypto Assets.
“Crypto Assets” refers to assets that are digital representations of value that are recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger.
“RIA Clients” are clients that themselves are SEC-registered investment advisers.
“State Banking Authority” means a state authority having supervision over banks.
SEC Commissioner Peirce issued a statement supportive of the staff no-action letter.
- Partner
Scott brings in-depth knowledge of SEC policies, procedures and enforcement philosophy to each representation. Scott regularly advises clients across a broad sector of the economy facing sensitive reporting, compliance and ...
The Hunton Blockchain Blog features opinions and legal analysis as we follow the development and use of distributed ledger technology known as the blockchain.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
Tags
- 2019 Leaders’ Declaration
- 2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing (the 2020 Strategy)
- Advancing Innovation to Assist Law Enforcement Act
- Airdrops
- AML compliance program
- AML/CFT
- Anonymity-Enhanced Cryptocurrencies
- Anti-Money Laundering
- Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA)
- Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
- Antifraud
- Aon and Marsh
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- Australia
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
- Automated Clearing House (ACH)
- Bank of England
- Bank Secrecy Act
- Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
- Bank Term Fund Program
- Bermuda
- Biden Administration
- BIS
- Bitcoin
- Bitcoin Cash
- Bitfinex
- BitLicense
- Blockchain
- Blockchain Incubators
- Blockchain Legislation
- Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act
- Blockchain Technology Act
- Brazil
- Breach of Contract
- Broker-Dealer
- Broker-Dealers
- BSA
- BSA Enforcement
- BTFP
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- California
- Canada
- Captive Insurance
- CCPA
- Celebrity Endorsers
- Central Bank
- Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL)
- CFTC
- Chapter 15
- China
- Christopher Giancarlo
- Civil Enforcement
- Class Actions
- Clearweb
- Colorado
- Commissioner
- Commodity Exchange Act
- Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Complaint Bulletin
- Compliance
- Compliance Note
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
- Consumer Protection
- Convertible Virtual Currency
- Corporate Compliance
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)
- Council of Institutional Investors
- Council of the European Union
- Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)
- Covered Stablecoins
- Cross-Border Data Transfer
- Crypto
- Crypto Arbitrage Trading accounts
- Crypto Assets
- Crypto Bank
- Crypto Custody
- Crypto Hackers
- Crypto Mining
- Crypto Task Force
- Crypto-commodity
- Crypto-currency
- Cryptoassets
- Cryptocurrency
- Cryptopia Limited
- Cryptosweep
- Custodial Arrangements
- CVCs
- cybercrime
- Cybersecurity
- Dalia Blass
- DAO Report
- Darknet
- darknet marketplaces
- Data Privacy
- Data Protection Authority
- Davos
- Debanking
- Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
- DeFi
- Del. Michael San Nicolas
- Delaware
- Department of Business and Industry
- Department of Justice
- Department of Treasury
- DFS
- Digital Asset
- Digital Asset Securities
- Digital Assets
- Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act of 2022
- digital currency
- digital currency ATM operators
- digital currency exchangers
- digital currency flows
- Digital Financial Assets Law (the Act)
- Digital Financial Technology
- Digital Token Act
- digital token sales
- Digital Tokens
- Distributed Ledger
- Division of Corporation Finance
- Documentary Stamp Tax (DST)
- Dodd-Frank
- DOJ
- Economic Sanctions
- EDPB
- Eleventh Circuit
- Endorsement Guides
- Enforcement Action
- ePrivacy
- Ether
- Ether Classic
- EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
- EU Regulation
- European Central Bank
- European Commission
- Exchange Act
- Exchange Traded Fund
- FDIC
- Federal Agencies
- Federal Election Commission
- Federal Reserve
- Federal Reserve Board
- Federal Trade Commission
- FedNow
- fiat currency MSBs
- Fiat-Backed
- Fight Illicit Networks and Detect Trafficking Act
- Figure Lending LLC
- Final Guidance
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
- Financial Institutions
- Financial Privacy
- Financial Stability Board
- Financial Stability Oversight Council
- Financial Stability Report
- Financial Technology Protection Act
- FinCEN
- FINRA
- FinTech
- Florida
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
- Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA)
- Form 1099-DA
- Form BE-12
- fractional interests
- FTC
- Gemini Dollar
- Gemini Trust Company
- Global Consortium for Digital Currency Governance
- Group of Seven
- Group of Twenty (G20) Finance Ministers
- H.R. 5635
- Hard Fork
- Heath Tarbert
- Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
- Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs)
- Homeland Security Assessment of Terrorists’ Use of Virtual Currencies Act
- House of Representatives
- House of Representatives’ Financial Services Committee
- Howey
- Howey test
- IEO
- iFinex Inc.
- Illinois
- India
- Information Sheet 225
- Initial Chain Offering
- initial exchange offerings (IEOs)
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- International
- International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Investor Protection
- IRS
- Jefferies Funding LLC
- Kenneth Blanco
- Kentucky
- KYC/AML requirements
- Lael Brainard
- Large Platform Utility
- Legislation
- Legislature
- Liechtenstein Parliament
- liquidity
- Litecoin
- Litigation
- Louisiana
- Ltd.
- Malicious Cyber Activity
- Malicious Cyber Actor
- managed stablecoin
- Martin Act
- Maryland
- Metaverse
- Mississippi
- Model Money Transmission Modernization Act
- model rule
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Money Service Business
- money services businesses (MSBs)
- Montana
- Mortgages
- Multi-Level Marketing Program (MLM)
- Mutual Fund
- Nakamoto
- narcotics
- NASAA
- Nebraska
- network maturity
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New York
- New York Attorney General
- New York Department of Financial Services (DFS)
- New Zealand
- NFT (Non-Fungible Token)
- NFTs
- Non-fungible tokens
- North Dakota
- North Korea
- NY Department of Financial Services
- OFAC
- Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
- Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Patent
- Paul Atkins
- Paxos Standard
- Paxos Trust Company
- Peer-To-Peer Exchangers
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Information
- President Trump
- President’s Working Group (PWG)
- Privacy
- privacy coins
- Proof-of-Stake
- Provenance.io
- Proxy Voting
- Public Blockchain
- Rapid Settlement
- Real Estate
- Regulation and Enforcement
- Rep. Sylvia Garcia
- Rescission
- Retail
- Ripple
- Ripple Labs
- Rule 233-1
- Russia
- Sanctions
- Sanctions Compliance Program (SHP)
- SAR lookback review
- SD8 coins
- SDN List
- SEC
- SEC Crypto-Securities
- SEC registration
- Securities
- Securities Act
- Securities Act of 1933
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Securities Exchange Commission
- security tokens
- Self-disclosure
- Senate Committee on Banking Housing and Urban Affairs
- Shareholder
- Shareholders
- SIFI
- Signature Bank
- Silicon Valley Bank
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Spencer Dinwiddie
- Stablecoins
- Stablecoins are Securities Act of 2019
- Staking Activities
- State-Sponsored Malicious Cyber Groups
- Suspicious Activity Report
- Suspicious Activity Reporting (SARs)
- SVB
- SWIFT messaging system
- Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA)
- Switzerland
- Synthetic Hegemonic Currency
- Taxation
- Templum
- Tennessee
- Terrorist Financing
- Tether Limited
- Texas
- Texas Business Organizations Code (TBOC)
- Texas Senate Bill 1859
- Texas Senate Bill 1971
- The World Bank
- Three-Year Safe Harbor
- Token and TT Service Provider Act
- Token Developers
- Token Transfer Limits
- Tokenization
- Tokenized Assets
- Trademark
- Travel Rule
- Trump Administration
- TT Identifier
- TT System
- TVTG
- U.S. Virtual Currency Market and Regulatory Competitiveness Act of 2019
- UCC Article 12
- UK Tax Rules
- Unhosted Wallets
- Uniform Commercial Code
- United Kingdom (UK)
- United Specialty Insurance Company
- United States Bankruptcy Code
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- US central bank digital currency (US CBDC)
- US Department of the Treasury
- US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- US dollar
- US Treasury
- USTR
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Virtual Asset Service Providers
- Virtual currencies
- Virtual Currency
- Virtual Currency Consumer Protection Act of 2019
- Virtual Currency Exchange
- Virtual Currency License
- Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act of 2020
- Virtual Markets Integrity Initiative
- Washington
- Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations
- World Economic Forum
- Wyoming
- XRP
Authors
- Jimmy Bui
- Mayme Donohue
- Nicholas Drews
- Andrew Feiner
- Jason Feingertz
- Hannah Flint
- Kevin E. Gaunt
- Armin Ghiam
- Carleton Goss
- Gregory G. Hesse
- Scott H. Kimpel
- Marysia Laskowski
- Michael S. Levine
- Lorelie S. Masters
- Patrick M. McDermott
- Uriel A. Mendieta
- Alex D. Pappas
- Daryl B. Robertson
- Natalia San Juan
- Caitlin A. Scipioni