What Happened
As we reported in yesterday's client alert, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) has announced that it is conducting a survey of all US businesses whose voting interests are 10% or more owned, directly or indirectly, by a foreign person. Responses to this survey are mandatory for every such US business enterprise, as described more fully below. These responses are due May 31, 2023 (or June 30, 2023 if submitted via the BEA’s electronic filing portal).
The Bottom Line
BEA is an independent statistical agency within the US Department of Commerce. The BEA is perhaps best known for calculating influential economic indicators such as the gross domestic product and the trade deficit. However, it also produces various reports relating to foreign investment in the United States.
As part of its responsibilities relating to foreign investment, the BEA collects data annually from US business enterprises 1 with foreign voting interests of at least 10%. These annual filings – reported on various types of Form BE-15 – are required to be prepared by US business enterprises if they are specifically contacted by the BEA for this purpose. However, once every five years, the BEA conducts a more comprehensive survey of all US business enterprises with foreign investment exceeding the specified reporting thresholds. This once-every-five-year survey on various types of Form BE-12 is required to be submitted by all US business enterprises meeting the reporting thresholds regardless of whether or not they are contacted by the BEA directly.
Subject to some limited exceptions discussed below, if a foreign person owned 10% or more of the voting interests of a US business enterprise as of the end of its 2022 fiscal year, that US business enterprise is considered a US affiliate and is required to file Form BE-12 with respect to its 2022 fiscal year no later than May 31, 2023 (or June 30, 2023 if filing electronically using the BEA electronic filing portal). There is no exception from the BEA’s filing requirements for US public companies despite the substantial information publicly available on them.
The Full Story
What is the purpose of this survey from the Bureau of Economic Analysis?
As noted above, the BEA is an independent, economic information gathering and analysis bureau within the Department of Commerce. The Form BE-12 is authorized pursuant to the International Investment and Trade in Services Survey Act (P.L. 94-472., 22 U.S.C. §§ 3101-3108) (the Act). The information gathered in the BEA survey is aggregated by the BEA and used in various reports it issues. An example of such a report is available here.
The Act provides that information provided to the BEA may be used only for analytical or statistical purposes. Without prior written permission from the provider, the information filed with the BEA cannot be presented in a manner that allows the provider to be individually identified and the information cannot be used for purposes of taxation, investigation, or regulation. Copies of the information supplied to the BEA or retained in the provider’s files are also immune from legal process.
Does the Form BE-12 reporting requirement apply to any US business merely if 10% or more of its voting interests are held by a foreign person at the end of the relevant period?
The short answer is generally “yes.” There is no de minimis investment (in terms of dollars) to which the filing obligation of a US affiliate does not apply; however, as described further below, the percentage ownership and the size of the US business together determine the complexity of the Form BE-12 that must be filed. There is no exception for publicly-traded companies. In addition, US private funds 2 are generally not considered to be subject to the Form BE-12 reporting requirement for US affiliates (i.e., a US private fund with a foreign parent) unless the foreign parent, through the fund, indirectly holds a 10% or greater interest in a US operating business.
What is a voting interest?
The starting point for the BE-12 filing requirement is the concept of a “US affiliate” of a foreign person, which is defined as any “U.S. business enterprise in which a foreign person … owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of the voting securities in an incorporated [US] business enterprise, or an equivalent interest in an unincorporated U.S. business enterprise, at the end of the business enterprise’s fiscal year that ended in the calendar year covered by the survey.” For most business enterprises (and for purposes of the Form BE-12 reports), this means that ownership is assessed as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Common stock of an incorporated entity is considered a voting interest; however, preferred stock without voting rights is generally not a voting interest.
For limited liability companies (LLCs), the BEA has specified that the percentage of voting interest is not based on the percentage of ownership in the LLC’s equity. Rather, LLCs are presumed to be controlled equally by each of its members (owners), unless a clause to the contrary is contained in the articles of organization or in the operating agreement. Even if one member is designated as the managing member responsible for the day-to-day operations of the LLC, this does not necessarily transfer control of the LLC from the non-managing members to the managing member. For example, if the managing member must obtain member approval for annual operating budgets and for other decisions relating to other significant business issues, then the managing member is not presumed to have a 100% voting interest in the LLC.
For limited partnerships, the presumption appears to swing in the opposite direction. In most cases, the general partner is presumed to control a limited partnership, and therefore, to have a 100% voting interest in the limited partnership.
What are the different types of Form BE-12 and what determines which form is applicable?
Form BE-12A is the most lengthy of the survey forms (36 pages including instructions) and is reserved for US affiliates meeting the following two requirements as of the fiscal year-end: (1) a majority of its voting interests are, directly or indirectly, owned by one or more foreign parents, and (2) the US affiliate has assets, sales, or net income (or loss) greater than $300 million.
Form BE-12B is a bit shorter than Form BE-12A (26 pages including instructions). This form is applicable to a US affiliate that is not subject to reporting on Form BE-12A if it has assets, sales, or net income (or loss) greater than $60 million.
Form BE-12C is the shortest of the forms (26 pages including instructions). This form is applicable to a US affiliate that is not subject to reporting on Form BE-12A or Form BE-12B (i.e., it has assets, sales, and net income (or loss) less than or equal to $60 million).
As noted above, each of these filing requirements are applicable only to a US affiliate – that is, a US company whose voting interests are at least 10% owned, directly or indirectly, by a foreign person. The BEA’s flow chart for determining what form is required is accessible here. The relevant form for each US affiliate is due May 31, 2023 (or June 30, 2023 if filed electronically).
What information is gathered from the US affiliate?
The precise scope of the information required to be provided by a US affiliate varies depending on the type of form that is applicable. Generally speaking, all of the reports require certain financial, employment, product, and industry information for the US affiliate and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. Separate supplements are required for each consolidated subsidiary. Additional information is required for unconsolidated subsidiaries. Certain information is also required to be provided up the ownership chain to each foreign person owning at least 10%, directly or indirectly, of the US affiliate’s voting interests.
Form BE-12B requires more extensive information than Form BE-12C, and Form BE-12A requires substantially more information than Form BE-12B or BE-12C. Depending on which form is applicable and the complexity of a US affiliate’s corporate structure and the complexity of its foreign ownership, answering one of these questionnaires can be a substantial undertaking. As an example, the BEA estimates that completing the Form BE-12A – the most onerous of the forms – will take between 7.5 and 678 hours per response, with an average completion time of 99 hours per response.
What are the penalties for non-compliance?
Civil fines, injunctive relief and (in the case of willful noncompliance) criminal penalties may be assessed for failure to file the appropriate form. The BEA will grant reasonable requests for extensions of the time to file. However, such requests must be filed before May 31, 2023.
*****
The national security, mergers and acquisitions and competition practices at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP will continue to monitor the development of this survey and applicable rules. Please contact us if you have any questions or would like further information or our assistance.
1 Business enterprises include all manner of incorporated and unincorporated organizations or ventures (including ownership of real estate) that are for purposes of profit making or economic advantage.
2 Under BEA guidance, “Private fund” refers to the same class of financial entities that must report to the Securities and Exchange Commission as private funds on Form PF: i.e., “any issuer that would be an investment company as defined in section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of … [the Investment Company] Act.”
The Hunton Andrews Kurth Blockchain Blog features opinions and legal analysis as we follow the development and use of distributed ledger technology known as the blockchain.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
Tags
- 2019 Leaders’ Declaration
- 2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing (the 2020 Strategy)
- Advancing Innovation to Assist Law Enforcement Act
- Airdrops
- AML compliance program
- AML/CFT
- anonymity-enhanced cryptocurrencies
- Anti-Money Laundering
- Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA)
- Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
- Antifraud
- Aon and Marsh
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- Australia
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
- Automated Clearing House (ACH)
- Bank of England
- Bank Secrecy Act
- Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
- Bank Term Fund Program
- Bermuda
- Biden Administration
- BIS
- Bitcoin
- Bitcoin Cash
- Bitfinex
- BitLicense
- Blockchain
- Blockchain Incubators
- Blockchain Legislation
- Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act
- Blockchain Technology Act
- Brazil
- Breach of Contract
- Broker-Dealer
- Broker-Dealers
- BSA
- BSA Enforcement
- BTFP
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- California
- Canada
- Captive Insurance
- CCPA
- Celebrity Endorsers
- Central Bank
- Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL)
- CFTC
- Chapter 15
- China
- Christopher Giancarlo
- Civil Enforcement
- Class Actions
- Clearweb
- Colorado
- Commissioner
- Commodity Exchange Act
- Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Complaint Bulletin
- Compliance
- Compliance Note
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
- Consumer Protection
- Convertible Virtual Currency
- Corporate Compliance
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)
- Council of Institutional Investors
- Council of the European Union
- Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)
- Cross-Border Data Transfer
- crypto arbitrage trading accounts
- Crypto Assets
- crypto bank
- crypto custody
- Crypto Hackers
- Crypto Mining
- Crypto-commodity
- Crypto-currency
- Cryptoassets
- Cryptocurrency
- Cryptopia Limited
- Cryptosweep
- CVCs
- cybercrime
- Cybersecurity
- Dalia Blass
- DAO Report
- Darknet
- darknet marketplaces
- Data Privacy
- Data Protection Authority
- Davos
- decentralized finance (DeFi)
- DeFi
- Del. Michael San Nicolas
- Delaware
- Department of Business and Industry
- Department of Justice
- Department of Treasury
- DFS
- Digital Asset
- Digital Asset Securities
- Digital Assets
- Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act of 2022
- digital currency
- digital currency ATM operators
- digital currency exchangers
- digital currency flows
- Digital Financial Assets Law (the Act)
- Digital Token Act
- digital token sales
- Digital Tokens
- Distributed Ledger
- Documentary Stamp Tax (DST)
- Dodd-Frank
- DOJ
- Economic Sanctions
- EDPB
- Eleventh Circuit
- Endorsement Guides
- Enforcement Action
- ePrivacy
- Ether
- Ether Classic
- EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
- EU Regulation
- European Central Bank
- European Commission
- Exchange Act
- Exchange Traded Fund
- FDIC
- Federal Election Commission
- Federal Reserve
- Federal Reserve Board
- Federal Trade Commission
- FedNow
- fiat currency MSBs
- Fiat-Backed
- Fight Illicit Networks and Detect Trafficking Act
- Figure Lending LLC
- Final Guidance
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
- Financial Privacy
- Financial Stability Board
- Financial Stability Oversight Council
- Financial Stability Report
- Financial Technology Protection Act
- FinCEN
- FINRA
- FinTech
- Florida
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
- Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA)
- Form BE-12
- fractional interests
- FTC
- Gemini Dollar
- Gemini Trust Company
- Global Consortium for Digital Currency Governance
- Group of Seven
- Group of Twenty (G20) Finance Ministers
- H.R. 5635
- Hard Fork
- Heath Tarbert
- Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
- home equity lines of credit (HELOCs)
- Homeland Security Assessment of Terrorists’ Use of Virtual Currencies Act
- House of Representatives
- House of Representatives’ Financial Services Committee
- Howey
- Howey test
- IEO
- iFinex Inc.
- Illinois
- India
- Information Sheet 225
- Initial Chain Offering
- initial exchange offerings (IEOs)
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- International
- International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Investor Protection
- IRS
- Jefferies Funding LLC
- Kenneth Blanco
- KYC/AML requirements
- Lael Brainard
- Large Platform Utility
- Legislation
- Legislature
- Liechtenstein Parliament
- liquidity
- Litecoin
- Litigation
- Louisiana
- Ltd.
- Malicious Cyber Activity
- Malicious Cyber Actor
- managed stablecoin
- Martin Act
- Maryland
- Metaverse
- model rule
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Money Service Business
- money services businesses (MSBs)
- Mortgages
- Multi-Level Marketing Program (MLM)
- Mutual Fund
- Nakamoto
- narcotics
- NASAA
- Nebraska
- network maturity
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New York
- New York Attorney General
- New York Department of Financial Services (DFS)
- New Zealand
- NFT (Non-Fungible Token)
- NFTs
- Non-fungible tokens
- North Dakota
- North Korea
- NY Department of Financial Services
- OFAC
- Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
- Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Patent
- Paxos Standard
- Paxos Trust Company
- peer-to-peer exchangers
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Information
- President’s Working Group (PWG)
- Privacy
- privacy coins
- Provenance.io
- Proxy Voting
- Public Blockchain
- rapid settlement
- real estate
- Regulation and Enforcement
- Rep. Sylvia Garcia
- Rescission
- Retail
- Ripple
- Ripple Labs
- Rule 233-1
- Russia
- Sanctions
- Sanctions Compliance Program (SHP)
- SAR lookback review
- SD8 coins
- SDN List
- SEC
- SEC crypto-securities
- SEC registration
- Securities
- Securities Act
- Securities Act of 1933
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Securities Exchange Commission
- security tokens
- Self-disclosure
- Senate Committee on Banking Housing and Urban Affairs
- Shareholder
- Shareholders
- SIFI
- Signature Bank
- Silicon Valley Bank
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Spencer Dinwiddie
- stablecoins
- Stablecoins are Securities Act of 2019
- State-Sponsored Malicious Cyber Groups
- Suspicious Activity Report
- suspicious activity reporting (SARs)
- SVB
- SWIFT messaging system
- Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA)
- Switzerland
- synthetic hegemonic currency
- Taxation
- Templum
- Tennessee
- Terrorist Financing
- Tether Limited
- Texas
- Texas Business Organizations Code (TBOC)
- Texas Senate Bill 1859
- Texas Senate Bill 1971
- The World Bank
- three-year safe harbor
- Token and TT Service Provider Act
- token developers
- token transfer limits
- tokenization
- tokenized assets
- Trademark
- Travel Rule
- Trump Administration
- TT Identifier
- TT System
- TVTG
- U.S. Virtual Currency Market and Regulatory Competitiveness Act of 2019
- UCC Article 12
- UK Tax Rules
- unhosted wallets
- Uniform Commercial Code
- United Kingdom (UK)
- United Specialty Insurance Company
- United States Bankruptcy Code
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- US central bank digital currency (US CBDC)
- US Department of the Treasury
- US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- US dollar
- US Treasury
- USTR
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Virtual Asset Service Providers
- Virtual currencies
- Virtual Currency
- Virtual Currency Consumer Protection Act of 2019
- Virtual Currency Exchange
- virtual currency license
- Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act of 2020
- Virtual Markets Integrity Initiative
- Washington
- Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations
- World Economic Forum
- Wyoming
- XRP
Authors
- Jimmy Bui
- Mayme Donohue
- Nicholas Drews
- Andrew Feiner
- Jason Feingertz
- Hannah Flint
- Kevin E. Gaunt
- Armin Ghiam
- Carleton Goss
- Gregory G. Hesse
- Scott H. Kimpel
- Marysia Laskowski
- Michael S. Levine
- Phyllis H. Marcus
- Lorelie S. Masters
- Patrick M. McDermott
- Uriel A. Mendieta
- Alex D. Pappas
- Daryl B. Robertson
- Natalia San Juan
- Caitlin A. Scipioni