Article 29 Working Party States Principles in EU Data Protection Law Apply to Big Data
Time 2 Minute Read

On September 16, 2014, the Article 29 Working Party (the “Working Party”) adopted a Statement on the impact of the development of big data on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in the EU (“Statement”). This two-page Statement sets forth a number of “key messages” by the Working Party on how big data impacts compliance requirements with EU privacy law, with the principal message being that big data does not impact or change basic EU data protection requirements.

Noting that the real value of big data remains to be proven, the Working Party rejected the idea that the principles of purpose limitation and data minimization, or the requirements that data must be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to its purpose, might have to be reconsidered at this time in light of big data.

It also expressed opposition to calls for a “use model” or a model primarily focused on risk of harm.

Instead, while acknowledging the need for innovative thinking on how key data protection principles apply in the context of big data, the Working Party found “no reason to believe that the EU data protection principles are no longer valid and appropriate for the development of big data.” However, it left open the possibility of “further improvements to make [the principles] more effective in practice” in the context of big data.

Other “key messages” include:

  • The Working Party supports making big data benefits available to individuals and society.
  • Big data raises important social, legal and ethical questions, including privacy and data protection rights.
  • Privacy expectations of users must be met in the context of big data.
  • Upholding the purpose limitation is essential to preclude companies that have built monopolies and dominant positions from inhibiting market entry by others.
  • The Working Party has already provided guidance on numerous big data-related issues such as purpose limitation, anonymization, legitimate interest, and necessity and proportionality in law enforcement.
  • The Working Party will work with international regulators to ensure that EU data protection rules are appropriately applied to big data.
  • The Working Party understands the compliance challenges caused by the varying requirements in different jurisdictions.
  • International cooperation is needed to provide consistent guidance on operational and compliance questions as well as on joint enforcement of applicable rules.
  • EU data protection rights that are based on a fundamental right are subject only to limited exceptions under the law.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 22, 2025, Google announced that it will continue to offer third-party cookies in its Chrome browser and will not roll out a new standalone prompt for third-party cookie preferences. 

Time 3 Minute Read

The Centre for Information Policy Leadership at Hunton recently released a white paper on Privacy-Enhancing and Privacy-Preserving Technologies in AI: Enabling Data Use and Operationalizing Privacy by Design and Default. CIPL is hosting a webinar on the key themes of the Paper on April 29, 2025.

Time 5 Minute Read

On January 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency published finalized Security Requirements for Restricted Transactions as designated by the Department of Justice in the DOJ’s final rulemaking, each pursuant to Executive Order 14117 (Preventing Access to Americans’ Bulk Sensitive Personal Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern). The Requirements and DOJ rule will go into effect on April 8, 2025.

Time 5 Minute Read

On December 24, 2024, the Oregon Attorney General published AI guidance, “What you should know about how Oregon’s laws may affect your company’s use of Artificial Intelligence,” (the “Guidance”) that clarifies how existing Oregon consumer protection, privacy and anti-discrimination laws apply to AI tools. Through various examples, the Guidance highlights key themes such as privacy, accountability and transparency, and provides insight into “core concerns,” including bias and discrimination.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page