Australian Data Breach Notification Bill Re-Introduced
Time 1 Minute Read

On March 20, 2014, Australia’s Privacy Amendment (Privacy Alerts) Bill 2014 was re-introduced in the Senate for a first read. The bill, which was subject to a second reading debate on March 27, 2014, originally was introduced on May 29, 2013, but it lapsed on November 12, 2013 at the end of the session.

As we previously reported, if passed, the bill would amend the Privacy Act 1988 by introducing a mandatory breach notification requirement for “serious data breaches.” The proposed definition of “serious data breach” includes a harm threshold: pursuant to the bill, the breach notification obligation would be triggered if unauthorized access to, or disclosure of, personal information would result in a “real risk of serious harm” to the individual to whom the information relates. In the event an organization “believes on reasonable grounds” that there has been a “serious data breach,” the organization would be required, as soon as practicable, to notify affected individuals and submit a copy of the notification to the Australian Privacy Commissioner. The bill also contemplates notification methods, and would allow the Privacy Commissioner to exempt organizations from the notification requirement under certain circumstances.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page