Belgian DPA Releases Report for Second Anniversary of the GDPR
Time 2 Minute Read

On the second anniversary of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), the Belgian Data Protection Authority (the “Belgian DPA”) published a Statement with some key GDPR-related numbers (the “Statement”).

Since May 2019, the Belgian DPA has received:

  • 937 data breach notifications;
  • 4,438 information requests;
  • 351 complaints;
  • 128 opinions requests on draft laws, decrees or orders; and
  • 5,416 data protection officer (“DPO”) notifications.

Since May 2019, the Investigation Service of the Belgian DPA has led more than 100 investigations. In the Statement, the Belgian DPA indicated that the Investigation Service had previously adopted a more reactive approach consisting of following up on complaints. From now on, the Investigation Service of the Belgian DPA intends to take a proactive approach and launch large-scale investigations relating to specific sectors or topics. For example, the Belgian DPA indicated it recently closed an investigation on compliance with cookie requirements across popular websites. In addition, in one year, the Litigation Chamber of the Belgian DPA imposed 59 sanctions, including 9 fines totaling €189,000. The Belgian DPA also was involved in several international cases with other European data protection authorities.

In the Statement, the Director of the Litigation Chamber, Hielke Hijmans, explained that the first aim of the Litigation Chamber is to actively and lastingly contribute to the effective protection of personal data and privacy by building case law that will guide organizations in their processing activities. Furthermore, David Stevens, President of the Belgian DPA, also stressed the importance of the Belgian DPA finding the right balance between monitoring the correct implementation of the rules and offering guidance to organizations on how to implement those rules. In light of this, the Belgian DPA has published a recommendation on direct marketing, launched a specific project for small and medium-sized enterprises and organized various events aimed at DPOs.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 23, 2026, a Joint Statement on AI-Generated Imagery was published by 61 data protection authorities. The Joint Statement addresses concerns regarding AI systems capable of generating realistic images and videos depicting identifiable individuals without their knowledge or consent.

Time 6 Minute Read

On February 9, 2026, trade association NetChoice filed a lawsuit challenging South Carolina’s newly passed Age-Appropriate Code Design (“SC AACD”) on First and Fourteenth Amendment grounds. The SC AACD was signed into law on February 5, 2026, making South Carolina the fifth U.S. state to enact such a law, following California, Maryland, Nebraska and Vermont.

Time 2 Minute Read

Congress has extended the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 through September 30, 2026 as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, a government funding package enacted in early February 2026.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page