California Advocate General Appeals Age-Appropriate Design Code Preliminary Injunction
Time 2 Minute Read

On October 18, 2023, California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an appeal to overturn a preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California last month that prevents the enforcement of the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CA AADC”). The appeal was submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and marks an important step in assessing the potential progress of the CA AADC.

In a press release, Attorney General Bonta stated that “We are filing a notice of appeal today to defend California’s first-in-the-nation children’s online safety law. We believe the district court decision is wrong, and that we should be able to protect our children as they use the internet. Big businesses have no right to our children’s data: childhood experiences are not for sale.”

The CA AADC was passed unanimously in the California legislature and was signed into law by California Governor Gavin Newsom on September 15, 2022. The Act had been set to take effect on July 1, 2024. The CA AADC requires covered businesses to comply with a specific set of rules with respect to online products, features, and services that are likely to be accessed by children – defined as any user under the age of 18. This includes obligations such as estimating the age of child users, configuring default privacy settings to the highest level, and completing a data protection impact assessment before any new products, services or features are made publicly available.

The motion for preliminary injunction was filed by NetChoice, a national trade association of large online businesses, in NetChoice v Bonta, and granted based on the District Court’s finding that NetChoice is likely to succeed on its claim that the CA AADC violates the First Amendment.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page