Department of Transportation Issues Cyber Guidance for Autonomous Cars
Time 2 Minute Read
Categories: Cybersecurity

On September 20, 2016, the Department of Transportation, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”), released federal cyber guidance for autonomous cars entitled Federal Automated Vehicles Policy (“guidance”).

The guidance makes a number of recommendations, including that automated vehicles should be designed to comply with “established best practices for cyber physical vehicle systems.” To that end, the guidance recommends manufacturers follow “guidance, best practices and design principles" published by National Institute for Standard and Technology, NHTSA and other industry groups, including the Automotive Information Sharing and Analysis Center (“Auto-ISAC”). Manufacturers also are encouraged to engage in information sharing – sharing data recorded during driving for the purpose of reducing crashes and improving highway safety, as well as sharing cyber threat signatures. The guidance recommends manufacturers report “any and all discovered vulnerabilities” to the Auto-ISAC as soon as possible.

Signaling a phased approach to driverless vehicle policy, the guidance is voluntary. The guidance is only the first step, however, and should not be viewed as foreclosing future federal regulations over driverless vehicles. President Obama noted in an op-ed that the guidance guides “states on how to wisely regulate these new technologies, so that when a self-driving car crosses from Ohio into Pennsylvania, its passengers can be confident that other vehicles will be just as responsibly deployed and just as safe,” but also said that “my administration is rolling out new rules of the road for automated vehicles.” Indeed, the President warned, “make no mistake: If a self-driving car isn’t safe, we have the authority to pull it off the road. We won’t hesitate to protect the American public’s safety.” Notably, the guidance comes on the heels of reports that Chinese cybersecurity researchers were able to hack into a driverless car from 12 miles away and tamper with electronically controlled features of the car, including brakes and locks.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page