Dutch DPA Fines Company 525,000 EUR for Failure to Designate EU Representative
Time 2 Minute Read

On May 12, 2021, the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, the “Dutch DPA”) imposed a €525,000 fine on Locatefamily.com for failure to comply with the obligation imposed under Article 27 of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) to appoint a representative in the EU.

Locatefamily.com is an online platform that publishes contact details (including telephone numbers and addresses) of individuals. According to the Dutch DPA, individuals often did not register for the online platform and did not know how their personal information ended up on the platform.

The Dutch DPA, who had received numerous complaints from individuals, found that the online platform had failed to comply with data erasure requests. In this context, the Dutch DPA also found that the online platform did not have establishments in the EU and did not appoint a representative, making it difficult for data subject to exercise their data protection rights.

Under Article 27(2)(a) of the GDPR, companies that (1) are not established in the EU and (2) offer goods or services to individuals in the EU or monitor the behavior of individuals in the EU must appoint a representative in the EU, except if the processing of personal data (1) is occasional; (2) does not include, on a large scale, processing of sensitive personal data or personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences; and (3) is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, taking into account the nature, context, scope and purposes of the processing.

Accordingly, the Dutch DPA imposed a €525,000 fine against Locatefamily.com as well as an order to appoint a representative by a certain date, subject to a penalty.

Read the press release and the decision (in Dutch).

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 5, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the agency had reached a settlement with Ford Motor Company resolving an enforcement action against the company that alleged noncompliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act’s opt-out of sale/sharing rights.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 23, 2026, a Joint Statement on AI-Generated Imagery was published by 61 data protection authorities. The Joint Statement addresses concerns regarding AI systems capable of generating realistic images and videos depicting identifiable individuals without their knowledge or consent.

Time 6 Minute Read

On February 9, 2026, trade association NetChoice filed a lawsuit challenging South Carolina’s newly passed Age-Appropriate Code Design (“SC AACD”) on First and Fourteenth Amendment grounds. The SC AACD was signed into law on February 5, 2026, making South Carolina the fifth U.S. state to enact such a law, following California, Maryland, Nebraska and Vermont.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page