EDPB Issues Opinion on Pay-Or-Consent Models
Time 2 Minute Read

On April 17, 2024, the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”) adopted its non-binding Opinion 08/2024 on Valid Consent in the Context of Consent or Pay Models Implemented by Large Online Platforms (the “Opinion”), stating that such models generally are not compliant with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), though their use should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The Opinion, which was requested by the Dutch, Norwegian and German (Hamburg) data protection authorities following Meta’s use of the model on its Facebook and Instagram platforms, considers the use of “consent or pay” models where users are asked to consent to processing for the purposes of behavioral advertising on large online platforms. The EDPB states that the concept of “larger online platforms” may cover, but is not limited to, “very large online platforms” as defined under the Digital Services Act and “gatekeepers” as defined under the Digital Markets Act.

The Opinion states: “[i]n most cases, it will not be possible for large online platforms to comply with the requirements for valid consent if they confront users only with a binary choice between consenting to processing of personal data for behavioural advertising purposes and paying a fee,” adding that this should not be the default approach adopted by controllers, who should instead consider offering an “equivalent alternative” that does not require payment of a fee.

In assessing whether these models would permit the collection of valid, “freely given” consent, as per the GDPR definition, controllers are advised by the EDPB to evaluate in each case whether there is an imbalance of power between the data subject and the controller, taking into account the position of the platform in the market, the existence of lock-in or network effects, the extent to which the data subject relies on the service and the main audience of the service.

Read the EDPB’s press release here, and the full Opinion here.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the Virginia Attorney General appealed a federal court’s grant of a preliminary injunction barring the enforcement of a new Virginia law requiring age verification and a time limit on social media use by minors under the age of 16 pending a final determination on the merits.    

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 5, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the agency had reached a settlement with Ford Motor Company resolving an enforcement action against the company that alleged noncompliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act’s opt-out of sale/sharing rights.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 23, 2026, a Joint Statement on AI-Generated Imagery was published by 61 data protection authorities. The Joint Statement addresses concerns regarding AI systems capable of generating realistic images and videos depicting identifiable individuals without their knowledge or consent.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 18, 2026, Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones announced that his office intends to fully enforce new provisions of the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act restricting minors’ use of social media.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page