Federal Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment to Government in an Action Against Dish Network Alleging Telemarketing Violations
Time 2 Minute Read
Categories: U.S. Federal Law

On January 21, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission announced that the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois granted partial summary judgment on December 12, 2014, to the federal government in its action against Dish Network LLC (“Dish”), alleging that Dish violated certain aspects of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”) that restrict placing calls to numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry and an entity’s internal Do-Not-Call list. The federal government is joined in the action against Dish by four state attorneys general alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and certain state laws related to telemarketing.

The government’s complaint stated that Dish directly telemarketed, and contracted with several “authorized dealers” to telemarket, Dish’s products, which primarily include satellite television programming. The government alleged that Dish, either directly or through its authorized dealers, placed millions of calls to numbers that were on the National Do-Not-Call Registry or on Dish’s internal Do-Not-Call list, both of which constituted violations of the TSR. Among other defenses, Dish argued that it was not responsible for its authorized dealers violations of the TSR because the company’s authorized dealers are independent contractors. The court was not persuaded by Dish’s argument, however, because Dish retained the relevant entities and authorized them to market Dish’s products. Thus, the court granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs with respect to Dish’s liability for the calls placed by certain of Dish’s authorized retailers.

Due to the existence of issues of fact, the court held that it could not grant summary judgment regarding the remedies available to the action’s plaintiffs. In their motion for summary judgment, which alleged 65 million impermissible calls, the federal government and four attorneys general claimed that the resulting civil penalty would be more than $725 billion. Although they acknowledged that “a smaller penalty is appropriate,” they also stated that a substantial award “was justified in light of Dish’s extraordinary culpability” and “poor compliance history.” They further noted that a $1 billion penalty “represents a mere 0.15% of the maximum penalty.”

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 3 Minute Read

The results are in: attorneys are filing more employment law cases in court.  Indeed, year-end reporting from legal databases like LexMachina confirm that the pace of filing new employment discrimination cases reached its highest level in 2025, surpassing 20,000 new filings nationwide.  Though overtime and minimum wage lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have continued to decline since 2015, discrimination cases under laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are on the rise.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page