FTC and CFPB "Joint Sweep" Results in Warning Letters and Formal Investigations
Time 3 Minute Read
Categories: Marketing

In a joint-agency media conference and press release with the Federal Trade Commission today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) used the “rulemaking-through-enforcement” method of regulation to create several de-facto guidelines for what is “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” in mortgage advertising. Bypassing the more arduous rulemaking process, the CFPB published “sample warning letters” that effectively made the following advertising practices illegal:

  1. Falsely suggesting – through the incorporation of “Government Loan Department” in a company’s return address at the top of an advertisement, the use of a logo very similar to that of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the prominent display of a website address that includes the initials of the Federal Housing Administration – that a company is affiliated with a government agency or government-sponsored program (i.e., ads with misrepresentations about government affiliation);
  2. Suggesting that consumers who enter into a reverse mortgage will have “no payments,” notwithstanding that such consumers may continue to be responsible for tax and insurance payments (i.e., ads with misleading statements about the costs of reverse mortgages);
  3. Falsely indicating that a consumer is pre-approved for, or guaranteed, specific loan rates or terms (i.e., ads with misrepresentations about the amount of cash or credit available to a consumer);
  4. Falsely indicating that a consumer entering into a reverse mortgage will have the opportunity to receive a discount on existing credit card debt in connection with the loan (i.e., ads with misleading statements about the benefits of reverse mortgages);
  5. Falsely suggesting — through the use of a logo very similar to that of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the prominent display of a website address that includes the acronym “VA” and the use of language stating “the VA is offering you” the advertised product — that a company is affiliated with a government agency or government-sponsored program (i.e., ads with misrepresentations about government affiliation);
  6. Indicating that a specific “fixed” rate is available for a “30-year” loan when, in fact, the stated rate is for an adjustable rate loan (i.e., ads with inaccurate information about interest rates); and
  7. Suggesting that the rate being offered is part of an “economic stimulus plan” that will expire shortly, notwithstanding that the Department of Veterans Affairs’ loan guarantee programs do not have an expiration date (i.e., ads with misrepresentations about government programs).

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 5, 2026, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed Alabama House Bill 161, the App Store Accountability Act, establishing age categorization, age verification and parental consent requirements for mobile application marketplace providers operating in Alabama, effective January 2027.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 5, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the agency had reached a settlement with Ford Motor Company resolving an enforcement action against the company that alleged noncompliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act’s opt-out of sale/sharing rights.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page