FTC Approves Settlement with Canadian Lockmaker Over Deceptive Security Claims
Time 1 Minute Read

We previously posted about the Tapplock, Inc. (“Tapplock”) settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) over allegations that the company violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by falsely claiming that its “smart locks” were secure. Earlier this month, the FTC voted 5-0 to approve the settlement.

Tapplock sells fingerprint-enabled, internet-connected padlocks that interact with a companion mobile app, allowing users to lock and unlock their padlocks when they are within Bluetooth range. The FTC alleged that the locks were not secure and that Tapplock failed to take reasonable precautions or follow industry best practices to protect consumer data. The FTC also alleged that Tapplock falsely claimed that the smart locks were designed to be “unbreakable” and that it took reasonable steps to secure user data.

Under the settlement, Tapplock is required to implement a comprehensive security program and obtain independent security assessments every other year by an assessor that the FTC has the authority to approve. The settlement also prohibits Tapplock from misrepresenting its privacy and security practices.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 23, 2026, the UK Information Commissioner's Office released new guidance clarifying the use of the new recognized legitimate interest lawful basis for processing personal information under UK data protection law.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 5, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the agency had reached a settlement with Ford Motor Company resolving an enforcement action against the company that alleged noncompliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act’s opt-out of sale/sharing rights.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page