German Appeals Court Finds German Data Protection Law Applicable to Facebook
Time 2 Minute Read

On January 24, 2014, the Chamber Court of Berlin rejected Facebook’s appeal of an earlier judgment by the Regional Court of Berlin in cases brought by a German consumer rights organization. In particular, the court: 

  • enjoined Facebook from, broadly, operating its “Find a Friend” functionality in a way that violates the German Unfair Competition Act;
  • enjoined Facebook from using certain provisions in (1) its terms and conditions, and (2) privacy notices concerning advertisements, licensing, personal data relating to third parties and personal data collected through other websites; and
  • mandated that Facebook provide users with more information about how their address data will be used by the “Find a Friend” functionality.

Similar to its earlier case against Apple, the German consumer rights organization successfully argued that German, not Irish, data protection law applied. Although other German courts have not always accepted this line of reasoning, the court followed it here and, notably, also held that a breach of data protection law also may constitute a breach of the Unfair Competition Act. This approach represents a new development in the data protection context. One of the conditions for consumer rights organizations to be able to commence legal proceedings is that there is a violation of the Unfair Competition Act. Recognizing data protection law violations as violations of the Unfair Competition Act therefore arguably makes it easier for consumer rights organizations to bring privacy-oriented cases. It also can be seen as part of a wider trend to improve the ability of German consumer rights organizations to sue for breaches of data protection law.

The Chamber Court’s ruling is not yet binding and is subject to appeal.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 3 Minute Read

The results are in: attorneys are filing more employment law cases in court.  Indeed, year-end reporting from legal databases like LexMachina confirm that the pace of filing new employment discrimination cases reached its highest level in 2025, surpassing 20,000 new filings nationwide.  Though overtime and minimum wage lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have continued to decline since 2015, discrimination cases under laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are on the rise.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page