German DPAs Issue Resolutions and Address a Wide Range of Topics at Annual Conference
Time 2 Minute Read

On March 22, 2012, the 83rd Conference of the German Data Protection Commissioners came to an end in Potsdam. The attendees indicated their general support for the European Commission’s proposed reform package aimed at modernizing and harmonizing data protection laws in the EU, but insist that Member States should have the authority to implement more stringent data protection measures for the area of public administration.

The Conference also covered the following topics:

  • the European Investigation Order (“EIO”) in criminal matters;
  • developing intelligent safety systems;
  • telecommunications surveillance;
  • law enforcement use of internet searches, including social networks; and
  • the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (“ACTA”).

The Conference resulted in Resolutions on the following three topics:

  • Draft EU Regulation for data protection. The Resolution on this topic contains criticism of the proposed reform package, and details specific requirements the German DPAs would like to see considered as part of the upcoming legislative process (e.g., strict regulation for profiling, generalized claims for damages and the right to use online services in an anonymous or pseudonymous way).
  • Publicly funded research projects to detect abnormal behavior in public. The Resolution on this topic includes statements and requirements for projects such as “INDECT” (intelligent information system supporting observation, searching and detection for security of citizens in urban environment) and “ADIS” (automated detection of situations that require intervention through classification of visual patterns).
  • European Investigation Order in criminal matters. The Resolution on this topic criticizes the draft EU Directive on the EIO and includes statements regarding issues that should be considered in the upcoming legislative process.

 

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines intended to clarify the application of the Cyber Resilience Act and opened a public consultation to gather feedback from stakeholders.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page