German Federal Network Agency Fines Two Companies €194,000 for Violating Cold Calling Ban
Time 2 Minute Read

On July 27, 2010, the German Federal Network Agency, the Bundesnetzagentur (or “BNetzA”), issued a press release stating that it had recently levied €194,000 in administrative fines in two cases against companies accused of violating a ban on cold calling.  The cases involved consumer complaints implicating the companies in several illegal acts.  The companies claimed they had obtained prior consent from the consumers they contacted.  The BNetzA, which is the regulatory office for electricity, gas, telecommunications, post and railway markets in Germany, rejected the companies’ argument on the grounds that the “consent” was based on the consumers’ implicit acceptance of the terms of use associated with certain Internet games.  The terms of use included a provision regarding a participant’s consent to telemarketing by partners, sponsors and other companies.  The BNetzA stated that, because these terms of use did not satisfy the legal requirements for consent, the company had not obtained valid consent to call the consumers.

The BNetzA has indicated that these investigations and administrative fine proceedings are time consuming and complex.  For example, the BNetzA must bring evidence showing that the caller culpably made prohibited advertisement calls.  Proving such intent may require questioning multiple witnesses and a legal examination of how prior consent was obtained in each case.

Since August 2009, making unsolicited marketing calls or suppressing caller ID in Germany constitutes an administrative offense subject to fines of up to €50,000 (for calls made without prior consent) and €10,000 (for not displaying the number).  Through April 2010, the BNetzA had received over 57,000 written complaints regarding unsolicited telephone advertising, and, to date, the BNetzA has completed eleven administrative proceedings resulting in fines totaling €694,000.  The proceedings thus far have concerned mainly violations of the ban on cold calls and failure to display the caller’s number.  Numerous investigations are pending at this time.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 5, 2026, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed Alabama House Bill 161, the App Store Accountability Act, establishing age categorization, age verification and parental consent requirements for mobile application marketplace providers operating in Alabama, effective January 2027.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 5, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the agency had reached a settlement with Ford Motor Company resolving an enforcement action against the company that alleged noncompliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act’s opt-out of sale/sharing rights.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page