Indian Privacy Law in the Works
Time 2 Minute Read

On October 19, 2013, the Center for Internet and Society (“CIS”), the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, and the Data Security Council of India held a Privacy Roundtable in New Delhi, the last in a series of roundtables that began in April 2013. The events were designed to elicit comments on a draft Privacy Protection Bill, proposed legislation for a privacy and personal data protection regime in India. The law would regulate the collection and use of personal data in India, as well as surveillance and interception of communications.

Speakers at the October 19 Roundtable included:

  • Jacob Kohnstamm, Chairman of the Article 29 Working Party and Chairman of the Dutch Data Protection Authority;
  • Chantal Bernier, Assistant Privacy Commissioner of Canada; and
  • Christopher Graham, UK Information Commissioner.

On September 20, CIS met with representatives from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to discuss U.S. privacy laws and potential frameworks and challenges to privacy in India.

Efforts to craft comprehensive privacy legislation in India (which would add to the Information Technology privacy regulations adopted in 2011) have been driven in part by EU concerns regarding personal data that is transferred to India for processing. Domestically, the use of personal identifiers (including biometric data) linked to comprehensive individual profiles has raised privacy issues for Indian citizens.

In 2011, the Planning Commission of the Government of India formed a group chaired by Justice Ajit Prakash Shah, former Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, to study international privacy laws, analyze existing Indian legal provisions and make specific proposals for incorporation into future Indian law. In October 2012, the group released the Report of the Group of Experts on Privacy, which summarizes privacy principles, national privacy rationales and emerging issues, and makes recommendations for a regulatory framework.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page