Louisiana recently enacted Senate Bill 386, the Louisiana Data Privacy Act (“LDPA”), becoming the 22nd U.S. state to adopt a comprehensive consumer data privacy law. The LDPA follows the now-familiar controller/processor and consumer-rights framework seen in many state comprehensive data privacy laws, with certain distinctions.
Scope
The LDPA applies to any person or entity that does business in Louisiana and satisfies at least one of the following thresholds:
- has annual gross revenues exceeding $25 million;
- annually buys, receives, “sells” (for monetary or other valuable consideration), or shares for commercial purposes the personal data of 75,000 or more consumers, households, or devices; or
- derives 50% or more of its annual revenues from selling consumers’ personal data.
Notably, unlike many other state comprehensive data privacy laws, the LDPA does not apply to entities that merely “target” Louisiana residents with their products and services. Rather, it applies to entities that ”do business” in the state, which may narrow the law's reach.
Like other state comprehensive data privacy laws, the LDPA exempts certain entities and data from its scope. Exempt entities include state agencies, GLB-regulated financial institutions, HIPAA-covered entities and business associates, nonprofits and institutions of higher education. Data-level exemptions include HR-related data, PHI and NPI.
Key Obligations
The LDPA imposes several obligations on controllers, including:
- Privacy Notice: Controllers must provide a reasonably accessible and clear privacy notice that discloses the categories of personal data (including sensitive data) processed; the purposes of processing; the categories of personal data sold to third parties; the categories of third parties receiving the data; and the methods for submitting consumer rights requests.
- Data Minimization: Controllers must limit the collection of personal data to what is adequate, relevant and reasonably necessary for the disclosed purposes.
- Security Safeguards: Controllers must implement and maintain reasonable administrative, technical and physical safeguards appropriate to the volume and nature of the data.
- Vendor Contracts: Contracts between controllers and processors must include the nature and purpose(s) of processing; the types of personal data subject to processing; the duration of processing; the rights and obligations of both parties; and requirements for confidentiality, data return/deletion, audit cooperation and sub-processor oversight.
- Data Protection Assessments: Controllers must conduct and document data protection assessments for higher-risk processing activities, including targeted advertising, the sale of personal data, profiling that presents a foreseeable risk of harm and the processing of sensitive data.
- Sensitive Data: Controllers must obtain prior consent to process sensitive data.
- Notably, unlike other state privacy laws, controllers that derive 50% or more of their annual revenues from the sale of personal data must obtain consumers’ separate consent to sell sensitive data.
- Sale of Sensitive or Biometric Data Notice:
- Controllers that sell sensitive personal data or biometric data must post a conspicuous notice stating “NOTICE: We may sell your sensitive personal data” or “NOTICE: We may sell your biometric personal data,” as applicable.
Consumer Rights
The LDPA provides Louisiana consumers the right to:
- confirm whether the controller is processing their personal data;
- access their personal data, including in a portable copy (if available in a digital format);
- correct inaccuracies in their personal data;
- delete their personal data;
- opt out of (i) targeted advertising, (ii) the sale of personal data, and (iii) profiling that produces a legal or similarly significant effect (consumers may designate an authorized agent, including through a technology-based opt-out signal that complies with the law’s requirements (e.g., Global Privacy Control)); and
- appeal the denial of a privacy request.
Controllers must respond to privacy requests within 45 calendar days of receipt, with a single 45-day extension available.
Effective Date and Enforcement
The LDPA will take effect January 1, 2027. The Louisiana Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority. Violations of the law constitute unfair and deceptive trade practices. A 30-day cure period applies from January 1, 2027 through July 31, 2027, after which the cure period expires.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron P. Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- Age Appropriate Design Code
- Age Verification
- Alabama
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- Attorney General
- Audit
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CalPrivacy
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL)
- Chatbot
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Consumer Rights
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cross-Border Data Transfer
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Breach
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Minimization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Protection Officer
- Data Security
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Deceptive Trade Practices
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Design
- Digital Markets Act
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DORA
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Electronic Protected Health Information
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- Financial Data
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Genetic Data
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Geolocation Data
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Grok
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- HIPAA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- Iowa
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Large Language Model
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Louisiana
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Michigan
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Mobile
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OCPA
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Online Behavioral Advertising
- Online Privacy
- Opt-In Consent
- Opt-Out
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Notice
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Profiling
- Protected Health Information
- Purpose Limitation
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk Assessment
- Risk-Based Approach
- ROSCA
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Salesforce
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- SECURE Data Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Sensitive Data
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Surveillance Pricing
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code