New Hampshire Law Gives Consumers Greater Control Over Non-Medical Uses of Protected Health Information
Time 2 Minute Read

New Hampshire recently enacted legislation restricting the use and disclosure of protected health information (“PHI”). As of January 1, 2010, health care providers and their business associates will be obligated to notify affected individuals of disclosures of PHI that are allowed under federal law, but are prohibited under the New Hampshire statute.

The New Hampshire law requires health care providers and their business associates to (i) obtain authorization for the use or disclosure of PHI for “marketing” and (ii) offer individuals an opt-out opportunity for the use or disclosure of PHI for fundraising purposes. In addition, it prohibits the disclosure of PHI for marketing (even with an authorization) or fundraising by voice mail, unattended facsimile, or through other methods of communication that are not secure.

In the event PHI is used or disclosed in violation of the New Hampshire law, the health care provider must notify affected individuals whose PHI was disclosed. Business associates will be responsible for the cost of notification if the non-compliant disclosure or use was by the business associate. The terms "business associate," "use," "disclosure" and "protected health information" have the same meanings as under HIPAA. Under the New Hampshire law individuals may file civil suits for violations of the marketing and fundraising restrictions, with possible damages of $1,000 or more per violation, plus legal fees and costs.

The full text of the New Hampshire bill (as signed into law) may be viewed here.
 

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights recently announced a settlement with health care software company MMG Fusion to resolve the company’s alleged noncompliance with the HIPAA Privacy, Security and Breach Notification Rules.

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page