Oregon Extends Data Breach Notification Requirements to Include Third-Party Vendors
Time 2 Minute Read

On May 24, 2019, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed Senate Bill 684 (the “Bill”) into law. The Bill, which takes effect January 1, 2020, amends the Oregon Consumer Identity Theft Protection Act (“OCITPA”) by enhancing the breach notification requirements applicable to third-party vendors.

Previously, OCITPA required any entity, public or private, that “owns, licenses, maintains, manages, collects, processes, acquires or otherwise possesses personal information” in the course of business to notify affected Oregon consumers as well as the Oregon Attorney General following a data breach. The Bill extends those obligations to “vendors,” meaning any person with which a previously covered entity contracts to maintain, store, process or otherwise access personal information.

The Bill requires vendors to notify the Oregon Attorney General of any breach of security involving the personal information of 250 or more Oregon residents in the most expeditious manner possible and no later than 45 days after discovering the breach. Additionally, the vendor must notify the covered entity with which the vendor has a contract as soon as possible and no later than 10 days after discovering the breach. Notably, the vendor is not required to give notice to the Attorney General if the covered entity has already done so.

The Bill also expands the definition of “Personal Information” covered by OCITPA to include a user name or other means of identifying a consumer for the purpose of permitting access to the consumer’s account, together with any other method necessary to authenticate the user name or means of identification.

Finally, the Bill provides that entities or vendors holding data in compliance with the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act are exempt from the state law’s breach notification requirements.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights recently announced a settlement with health care software company MMG Fusion to resolve the company’s alleged noncompliance with the HIPAA Privacy, Security and Breach Notification Rules.

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page