Plaintiffs File Class Action Lawsuit Against Nielsen Over Alleged False and Misleading Statements
Time 2 Minute Read
Categories: U.S. Federal Law

On August 28, 2018, plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit against Nielsen Holdings PLC ("Nielsen") and some of its officers and directors for making allegedly materially false and misleading statements to investors about the impact of privacy regulations and third-party business partners’ privacy policies on the company’s revenues and earnings. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. 

The complaint alleges that Nielsen made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Nielsen recklessly disregarded its readiness for and the true risks of privacy-related regulations and policies, including the EU General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"), on its current and future financial and growth prospects; (2) Nielsen's financial performance was far more dependent on Facebook and other third-party large data set providers than previously disclosed, and privacy policy changes affected the scope and terms of access Nielsen would have had to third-party data; and (3) access to Facebook and other third-party provider data was becoming increasingly restricted for Nielsen and Nielsen clients. Plaintiffs allege that, as a result, Nielsen's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

The complaint maintains that, because of Nielsen’s “material misrepresentations and omissions, Nielsen stock traded at artificially inflated prices.” The complaint further alleges that when Nielsen published its financial results for the second quarter of 2018 announcing that it missed revenue and earnings targets, its stock plummeted, which caused substantial harm to the plaintiffs who were investors in Nielsen stock. In that announcement, Nielsen cited the impact of the GDPR on the company’s results and announced that its CEO and Executive Chairman, Mitch Barns, would retire from the company at the end of 2018.

Read the complaint.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

A recent summary judgment order is a reminder that, in insurance coverage disputes, straightforward arguments can still win the day. In a coverage action arising from dozens of underlying personal injury suits, the court adopted a clear, text-based approach to the duty to defend—and ordered the insurer to provide a defense.

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 3 Minute Read

The post-COVID real estate market has seen a surge in luxury gyms and fitness spaces.  Members are willing to shell out several hundred dollars a month for memberships at popular high-end fitness chains. These modern luxury gyms offer more than just workout spaces.  Many offer holistic lifestyle services such as spas, hair salons, social amenities, co-working spaces, and daycare. These luxury gyms are gaining larger footprints and emerging as a unique retail asset.

Time 3 Minute Read

The results are in: attorneys are filing more employment law cases in court.  Indeed, year-end reporting from legal databases like LexMachina confirm that the pace of filing new employment discrimination cases reached its highest level in 2025, surpassing 20,000 new filings nationwide.  Though overtime and minimum wage lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have continued to decline since 2015, discrimination cases under laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are on the rise.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page