Portuguese DPA Orders Suspension of U.S. Data Transfers by Agency That Relied on SCCs
Time 2 Minute Read

On April 27, 2021, the Portuguese Data Protection Authority (Comissão Nacional de Proteção de Dados, the “CNPD”) ordered the National Institute of Statistics (the “INE”) to suspend, within 12 hours, any international transfers of personal data to the U.S. or other third countries that have not been recognized as providing an adequate level of data protection.

The INE gathers data from Portuguese residents from 2021 Census surveys and transfers it to Cloudfare, Inc. (“Cloudfare”), a service provider in the U.S. that assists the surveys’ operation. EU Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) are in place with the U.S. service provider to legitimize the data transfers.

Upon receiving a number of complaints, the CNPD started an investigation into the INE’s data transfers outside of the EU. The CNPD concluded that Cloudfare is directly subject to U.S. surveillance laws for national security purposes. According to the CNPD, those surveillance laws impose a legal obligation on companies like Cloudfare to give unrestricted access to personal data to U.S. public authorities without informing data subjects.

In its decision, the CNPD referred to the Schrems II ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) which concluded that the limitations on the protection of personal data arising from U.S. domestic law on the access and use of the transferred data by U.S. public authorities were not circumscribed in a way that satisfies requirements that are essentially equivalent to those required under EU law by the principle of proportionality, in so far as the surveillance programs based on those provisions are not limited to what is strictly necessary.

Accordingly, the CNPD decided that personal data transferred to the U.S. by the INE was not afforded a level of data protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed under EU law. The CNPD also highlighted that, pursuant to the Schrems II ruling, data protection authorities are obliged to suspend or prohibit data transfers, even when those transfers are based on the European Commission’s SCCs, if there are no guarantees that these can be complied with in the recipient country. In ordering the suspension of the data transfers to the U.S., the CNPD took into account the fact that the data transferred included sensitive data (including data related to individuals’ religion or health condition) of a large number of individuals.

Read the decision and press release (in Portuguese).

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines intended to clarify the application of the Cyber Resilience Act and opened a public consultation to gather feedback from stakeholders.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 23, 2026, a Joint Statement on AI-Generated Imagery was published by 61 data protection authorities. The Joint Statement addresses concerns regarding AI systems capable of generating realistic images and videos depicting identifiable individuals without their knowledge or consent.

Time 6 Minute Read

On February 9, 2026, trade association NetChoice filed a lawsuit challenging South Carolina’s newly passed Age-Appropriate Code Design (“SC AACD”) on First and Fourteenth Amendment grounds. The SC AACD was signed into law on February 5, 2026, making South Carolina the fifth U.S. state to enact such a law, following California, Maryland, Nebraska and Vermont.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page