U.S. Chamber of Commerce Testifies about Safe Harbor at a Joint Hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives
Time 2 Minute Read

On November 3, 2015, John Murphy, Senior Vice President for International Policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, testified about the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (“CJEU’s”) EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Decision at a joint hearing of the House Commerce and Communications and Technology Subcommittees.

Murphy’s testimony emphasized the economic relationship between the U.S. and the EU and stressed that this relationship “relies on the seamless flow of data across borders.” He stated that the CJEU’s decision invalidating the Safe Harbor agreement threatens the transatlantic flow of data. Murphy noted that the CJEU’s decision focused on “process concerns” within the Safe Harbor agreement, such as restrictions placed on EU Member States’ enforcement authority, and did not address “the actual substantive commercial data protection rules.”

Accordingly, Murphy thanked the House for passing the Judicial Redress Act, which is intended to address one of the process concerns identified by the CJEU, and encouraged Congress to work with a group of European Parliamentarians who are in Washington D.C. this week to resolve outstanding issues regarding Safe Harbor. He concluded by urging U.S. and EU officials to promptly implement a revised Safe Harbor framework to allow European and American companies to transfer data across the Atlantic.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page