UK ICO Publishes Draft Guidance on Profiling Tools for Online Safety
Time 2 Minute Read

On July 30, 2025, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) launched a consultation seeking feedback on its draft guidance concerning the use of profiling tools for online safety (the “Guidance”). The Guidance aims to assist organizations with their compliance with the UK Online Safety Act 2023 (“OSA”), the UK General Data Protection Regulation (the “UK GDPR”), and the UK Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (“PECR”), outlining the data protection and privacy considerations organizations should take into account when utilizing profiling tools in trust and safety systems.

The Guidance is divided into different sections, highlighting several critical issues that organizations should consider, such as:

  • PECR adherence: Profiling tools using storage and access technologies on user devices must comply with PECR, requiring prior consent in accordance with the standard of consent required by UK GDPR, unless exemptions apply.
  • Lawful basis for processing: Profiling activities must have a lawful basis under the UK GDPR, such as consent or legitimate interests, and must comply with any additional conditions for processing special category or criminal offense data.
  • Transparency: Clear information must be provided to users about how their data is being used in profiling processes. The Guidance recommends that organizations should regularly review their profiling tools to minimize the risk of unfair outcomes for users.
  • Data minimization: Organizations must define clear, specific purposes for collecting and processing data with profiling tools, ensuring only data that is necessary for such purposes is used.
  • Accuracy: Organizations should ensure profiling tools process accurate, up-to-date information, and allow users to challenge inaccuracies. As many profiling tools will likely utilize AI and automation, organizations should distinguish predictive outcomes from factual data and ensure they balance statistical accuracy with fairness, considering measures such as precision and recall, and the risks to users of each.
  • Retention: Profiling tools must not keep personal information longer than necessary. Organizations must establish retention periods and erase or anonymize personal information when it is no longer needed.
  • Automated decision-making: Organizations must identify if profiling tools make solely automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects and ensure compliance with Article 22 of the UK GDPR by, for example, mapping workflows, providing transparency, and implementing safeguards such as human intervention.

Organizations have until October 31, 2025, to provide the ICO with feedback on the Guidance.  

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 24, 2026, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 2225, an Act regulating artificial intelligence companion chatbots.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 25, 2026, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office and the UK Office of Communications released a joint statement addressing the intersection of online safety and data protection in relation to age assurance.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page