COVID-19 UPDATE: USCIS Relaxes Requirements To Verify Identity on Form I-9
Time 2 Minute Read
COVID-19 UPDATE:  USCIS Relaxes Requirements To Verify Identity on Form I-9

On March 12, we recommended that employers designate authorized representatives to complete and reverify Forms I-9 in person during COVID-19 closures and furloughs.  On March 24, we updated our guidance in detail because, in response to COVID-19, USCIS began allowing employers and employees to complete Forms I-9 remotely.  The agency has now further relaxed I-9 verification requirements.

On May 1, 2020, USCIS announced that, effective immediately, employers may begin accepting expired documents from new hires to satisfy List B identity verification.  However, this exception applies only if the document expired on or after March 1, 2020, and the issuing agency has not auto-extended the document.  Employers must treat these expired ID documents under the “90-day Receipt Rule.”  In other words, the documents are acceptable for only 90 days after hire.  By Day 91, the employee must present either the renewed document or another acceptable List A or List B document to verify identity in order to continue working lawfully.  The expired identity document may also be used to create the E‑Verify case within the required 3 days after hire date.

Some expired documents, including driver’s licenses in many states, have been automatically extended by the issuing agency under COVID-19 rules.  Employers may accept these auto‑extended documents as currently valid for I-9 identity verification.  The “Receipt Rule” does not apply to these documents, which are valid on presentation and should never be re-verified.

Form I-9 compliance rules are strict and subject to government audit and enforcement, even under COVID-19.  Employers should consult competent immigration counsel for detailed and specific guidance on proper completion, updating, and documentation of Form I-9 under each of the above scenarios.

  • Counsel

    Suzan’s practice focuses exclusively on US immigration and nationality law. Suzan represents businesses and individuals in administrative proceedings before the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Customs and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On October 12, 2022, the UK Information Commissioner's Office (“ICO”) launched a public consultation on its draft guidance on employers’ obligations when monitoring at work (“Draft Guidance”). In addition, the ICO has published an impact scoping document, which outlines some of the context and potential impacts of the Draft Guidance (“Impact Scoping Document”).

Time 3 Minute Read

Over the last two years, courtesy of a once-a-century pandemic, government-mandated business closures, nationwide stay-at-home orders, and—unprecedented—disruptions to the global supply chain have illuminated, previously unknown, vulnerabilities across a whole host of industries. Would anyone have seriously questioned the viability of office space two years ago? Now, inflation, in keeping with the recent chaos, may be upending the viability of another tried-and-tested institution: the supply contract.

Time 2 Minute Read

The FTC, through the Department of Justice, has entered a settlement with two companies and the joint corporate President for falsely claiming that the LED lighting products and personal protective equipment (PPE) they sold were “Assembled in the USA,” “Buy American Act Compliant,” “Manufactured in the USA” and “100% Made in the USA,” despite having been imported from China. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants, Axis LED Group, LLC, ALG-Health LLC and Adam J. Harmon, went so far as to peel “Made in China” stickers off the products and replace them with Made in USA labels. The FTC had previously investigated and warned the companies, and received assurances that they would remove unqualified Made in USA claims from their marketing materials. The defendants subsequently were investigated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) over safety superiority claims for their KN95 masks.

Time 4 Minute Read

On June 13, 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) released guidance to help covered entities understand how they can use remote communication technologies for audio-only telehealth in compliance with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules (the “Guidance”). Specifically, the Guidance clarifies how audio-only telehealth can be conducted after OCR’s Notification of Enforcement Discretion for Telehealth (the “Telehealth Notification”), put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, is no longer in effect.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page