COVID-19 UPDATE: Visa Waiver Travelers Now Have Another Option if They Cannot Leave on Time
Time 1 Minute Read
COVID-19 UPDATE:  Visa Waiver Travelers Now Have Another Option if They Cannot Leave on Time

On March 30, 2020, we wrote about “satisfactory departure” in COVID-19:  How Does the Outbreak Affect Visa Waiver (ESTA) Travelers?  As we explained, visitors to the US who arrive under the Visa Waiver program who cannot depart within 90 days due to the pandemic may request a 30-day “satisfactory departure” period from US Customs & Border Protection by email.

On April 13, 2020, US Citizenship & Immigration Services announced it would begin taking requests for satisfactory departure by phone while its local field offices remain closed during COVID-19.  Visa Waiver travelers who wish to use this option should call the USCIS Contact Center at 800-375-5283.  USCIS has also said it can grant a second 30-day period of satisfactory departure if circumstances warrant.

US Customs & Border Protection also continues to grant satisfactory departure, as we reported on March 30.

Receiving satisfactory departure, whether it is granted by CBP or by USCIS, protects a traveler’s eligibility to continue using the Visa Waiver program in the future, as long as the visitor does leave within the required additional period of stay.

  • Counsel

    Suzan’s practice focuses exclusively on US immigration and nationality law. Suzan represents businesses and individuals in administrative proceedings before the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Customs and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

A temporary final rule initiating a 12-month pilot program requiring visitor visa bonds is set to go into effect on August 20th.  This rule, authorized under INA 8 USC 1201(g)(3), allows consular officers to require a “Maintenance of Status and Departure Bond” (the "visa bond") for those applying for nonimmigrant visas. Historically, State Department guidance, as detailed in the Foreign Affairs Manual (“FAM”), has discouraged the use of visa bonds, suggesting they should be rarely employed.

Time 3 Minute Read

On October 12, 2022, the UK Information Commissioner's Office (“ICO”) launched a public consultation on its draft guidance on employers’ obligations when monitoring at work (“Draft Guidance”). In addition, the ICO has published an impact scoping document, which outlines some of the context and potential impacts of the Draft Guidance (“Impact Scoping Document”).

Time 3 Minute Read

Over the last two years, courtesy of a once-a-century pandemic, government-mandated business closures, nationwide stay-at-home orders, and—unprecedented—disruptions to the global supply chain have illuminated, previously unknown, vulnerabilities across a whole host of industries. Would anyone have seriously questioned the viability of office space two years ago? Now, inflation, in keeping with the recent chaos, may be upending the viability of another tried-and-tested institution: the supply contract.

Time 2 Minute Read

The FTC, through the Department of Justice, has entered a settlement with two companies and the joint corporate President for falsely claiming that the LED lighting products and personal protective equipment (PPE) they sold were “Assembled in the USA,” “Buy American Act Compliant,” “Manufactured in the USA” and “100% Made in the USA,” despite having been imported from China. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants, Axis LED Group, LLC, ALG-Health LLC and Adam J. Harmon, went so far as to peel “Made in China” stickers off the products and replace them with Made in USA labels. The FTC had previously investigated and warned the companies, and received assurances that they would remove unqualified Made in USA claims from their marketing materials. The defendants subsequently were investigated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) over safety superiority claims for their KN95 masks.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page