DOL Issues FAQs On H-2B Processing After Pérez v. Pérez
Time 2 Minute Read

On March 20, 2015, the U.S. Department of Labor issued new FAQs providing more details on the latest developments in the ongoing federal court case challenging DOL's authority to issue and implement regulations for the H-2B temporary worker program.

The H-2B program allows U.S. employers to bring nonagricultural workers from foreign countries to fill temporary U.S. jobs based on one-time occurrences or the employer's need for seasonal, peak load or intermittent workers. While H-2B petitions must be filed with and approved by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DOL oversees the preliminary steps employers must comply with before filing those petitions, including obtaining prevailing wage determinations and proving no qualified U.S. workers are available for the positions. Since the federal court's vacatur of DOL's authority to carry out its part of the H-2B program, USCIS has also stopped processing I 129 petitions for H-2B workers.

As the FAQs explain, the federal court for the Northern District of Florida granted, on March 18, 2015, a temporary stay of its vacatur order and judgment in Pérez v. Pérez. That order/judgment, issued on March 4, 2015, vacated DOL's H 2B regulations and required the agency to stop processing H-2B prevailing wage requests, job orders, and temporary labor certification applications immediately. The temporary stay of the court's order is effective through April 15, 2015. During that period, DOL will resume processing pending H 2B requests, orders and applications and will accept new ones.

On April 16, 2015, when the temporary stay is currently scheduled to end, DOL (and presumably USCIS) will again cease H 2B processing. On and after that date, until further notice, employers may no longer file job orders, wage requests or labor certification applications under the H-2B program, and any such filings that are still pending will not be processed further.

  • Counsel

    Suzan’s practice focuses exclusively on US immigration and nationality law. Suzan represents businesses and individuals in administrative proceedings before the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Customs and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

Recent court decision continues trend of US making significant improvements in allowing the accompanying spouses of foreign workers to lawfully work in the United States.

Time 4 Minute Read

For the second time in the past ten years, the Supreme Court has upheld the doctrine of consular non-reviewability of visa decisions and denied relief to the U.S. citizen spouse seeking to challenge the denial of a visa to a spouse. 

Time 4 Minute Read

Timely notice is an important first step in a successful insurance recovery.  But insurance policies are not always straightforward in identifying how, when, and to whom notice must be provided.  Some states may also impose additional procedural hurdles, including requiring policyholders to contact their insurers before filing suit (the idea behind this requirement is that it may avoid litigation).  Failing to comply with pre-suit requirements can hurt the policyholder’s recovery, as illustrated in a recent decision from the Northern District of Texas. 

Time 3 Minute Read

Seasoned business immigration attorneys recall “visa revalidation” with great fondness.  It is hard to imagine now, with visa appointment backlogs of months and even years at U.S. consulates all over the world, but it was once possible to send a passport to the Department of State’s Revalidation Division in St. Louis, Missouri, along with a few simple supporting documents, and within 10 to 12 weeks, get the passport back with a renewed visa in it.  Those were the days!

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page