California Attorney General Settles Laptop Spying Case with Rent-to-Own Franchisor
Time 2 Minute Read

On October 14, 2014, rent-to-own retailer Aaron’s, Inc. (“Aaron’s”) entered into a $28.4 million settlement with the California Office of the California Attorney General related to charges that the company permitted its franchised stores to unlawfully monitor their customers’ leased laptops.

The settlement stems from a complaint filed on October 7 in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles by the Attorney General of California. The complaint accused Aaron’s of violating its California customers’ constitutional right to privacy when it “turned a blind eye as its franchisees installed spyware on computers rented to unsuspecting customers.” The complaint also accused Aaron’s of violating California’s unfair business practices law by making false and misleading statements in advertisements and by engaging in unlawful billing and rental practices.

Under the settlement, Aaron’s agreed to refund $25 million to California consumers who leased laptops from the company’s franchised stores between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2014, and to pay $3.4 million in civil penalties and fees. The company also agreed not to use any monitoring technology on its customers’ leased computers without appropriate notice and consent.

In October 2013, Aaron’s entered into a settlement agreement with the FTC over similar charges that the franchisor knowingly assisted its franchisees in spying on consumers. And last month, Vermont’s Attorney General reached a settlement with one of the company’s franchisees, SEI/Aaron’s, Inc., over charges that the franchisee’s spying activities violated Vermont’s debt collection laws.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page