CIPL Submits Comments to ICDPPC Declaration on Ethics and Data Protection in AI
Time 1 Minute Read

On January 25, 2019, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership (“CIPL”) at Hunton Andrews Kurth submitted formal comments to the International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners (the “International Conference”) on its Declaration on Ethics and Data Protection in Artificial Intelligence (the “Declaration”). The Declaration was adopted by the International Conference on October 23, 2018, for public consultation.

As we previously reported, the Declaration endorses several guiding principles as core values to preserve human rights as artificial intelligence technology develops. CIPL welcomes and shares many of the views expressed by the International Conference with respect to these six guiding principles.

In its comments on the Declaration, CIPL recommends several specific modifications and clarifications to the guiding principles of fairness, continued attention and vigilance and accountability, transparency and intelligibility, responsible design and development, individual empowerment and reducing or mitigating unlawful biases and discriminations.

These comments are intended to assist the newly set up International Conference permanent working group on Ethics and Data Protection in AI as it seeks to establish common governance principles on artificial intelligence at an international level.

To read CIPL’s recommendations on these principles, please view the full paper.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 24, 2026, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 2225, an Act regulating artificial intelligence companion chatbots.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page