CPPA Board Holds Meeting on Status of CPRA Rulemaking and Other Topics
Time 3 Minute Read

On December 16, 2022, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) Board held a public meeting regarding the status of the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”) rulemaking process and other topics, such as the CPPA’s advocacy regarding proposed federal and state privacy legislation.

Status of Draft Regulations and Timeline

The CPPA anticipates posting in late January or early February 2023 a final version of the modified proposed regulations released on November 3, 2022. The final version will incorporate any changes resulting from a second round of public comment. If there are no further modifications or delays, the finalized set of regulations could go into effect around April 2023.

New Rulemaking Activities on Risk Assessments, Cybersecurity Audits and Automated Decisionmaking

The CPRA law calls for regulations regarding risk assessments, cybersecurity audits and automated decisionmaking, including profiling, but the CPPA has not yet issued these regulations in draft form. For this rulemaking, a new CPPA rules subcommittee introduced proposed topics and questions to the CPPA Board for proposed preliminary rulemaking activities to occur in early 2023.

The proposed topics for the preliminary rulemaking include:

  • Privacy and security risk assessments: relevant existing laws and requirements; the persons susceptible to harm; factors for determining risk; requirements for automated decisionmaking including profiling; models for submitting risk assessments, including whether the CPPA should follow the approach outlined in the European Data Protection Board’s Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment; and application to businesses with less than $25 million in annual gross revenues;
  • Cybersecurity audits: relevant existing laws and best practices for cybersecurity audits, assessments and evaluations; and processes that help to ensure that these practices are thorough and independent; and
  • Automated decisionmaking, including profiling: relevant existing laws, requirements, frameworks and best practices; the prevalence of algorithmic discrimination and how access and opt-out rights can address the issue; implementing access and opt-out rights in different sectors or industries; and providing more specificity regarding “meaningful information” about the logic involved in automated decisionmaking.

As anticipated, the questions for this preliminary rulemaking would be finalized at a later CPPA Board meeting and released for public comment, which would inform further rulemaking activities.

Other Items: CPPA Advocacy Regarding Proposed Federal and State Legislation

The CPPA released a memo outlining recommended steps for the CPPA to take a position on introduced legislation, whether state or federal, and put forward legislative proposals to California lawmakers. The recommendations follow the steps the CPPA took in opposing the American Data Privacy and Protection Act, H.R. 8152, which, the CPPA highlights, “seeks to preempt nearly all provisions of the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended.”

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page