European Member States and ENISA Issue SOPs to Manage Multinational Cyber Crises
Time 2 Minute Read

On February 5, 2014, the Member States of the EU and European Free Trade Association (“EFTA”) as well as the European Network and Information Security Agency (“ENISA”) issued Standard Operational Procedures (“SOPs”) to provide guidance on how to manage cyber incidents that could escalate to a cyber crisis.

Background
In 2009, the European Commission’s Communication on Critical Information Infrastructure Protection invited EU Member States to develop national contingency plans and organize regular exercises to enhance a closer pan-European Network and Information Security (“NIS”) cooperation plan.

In February 2013, the European Commission, together with the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, launched their cybersecurity strategy (“Strategy”) for the European Union. As part of this Strategy, the European Commission also proposed a draft directive on measures to ensure a common level of NIS across the EU (the “Directive”). The Directive introduces a number of measures, including the creation of a network to enable the national NIS authorities, the European Commission and, in certain cases, ENISA and the Europol Cybercrime Center, to share early warnings on risks and incidents, and to cooperate on further steps and organize exercises at the European level.

In this context, the EU/EFTA Member States developed the SOPs in collaboration with ENISA. The draft SOPs were tested during the pan-European cyber exercises organized by ENISA.

The SOPs
The SOPs include a list of contact points, guidelines, templates, workflows, tools and best practices to help European public authorities better understand the causes and impacts of multinational cyber crises and identify effective action plans. In particular, the SOPs emphasize the need to establish direct links to the decision makers at the strategic and political level in order to successfully manage multinational cyber crises.

ENISA continues to work with EU Member States to develop information security best practices and assist the Member States with the implementation of relevant EU legislation.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines intended to clarify the application of the Cyber Resilience Act and opened a public consultation to gather feedback from stakeholders.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page