FTC Issues New COPPA Case Involving Behavioral Advertising in Kids’ Apps: Issues 4 Million Dollar Civil Penalty Amid Dissenting Vote
Time 2 Minute Read

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced its latest Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) settlement with California-based app developer HyperBeard and its individual principals. According to the FTC, since at least 2016, HyperBeard has offered a number of child-directed mobile apps, with names like BunnyBuns, KleptoCats and NomNoms that featured brightly colored, animated characters, such as cats, dogs, bunnies, chicks, monkeys and other cartoon characters, and that are described in child-friendly terms like “super cute” and “silly.” These apps are free to download and play, but they generate revenue through in-app advertising and purchases. The FTC alleges that the defendants were aware that children were using their apps, and that they promoted them to child audiences on a kids’ entertainment website, through children’s books and through the merchandizing of officially licensed plush stuffed animals and toys. Defendants allowed third-party ad networks to collect persistent identifiers from children in order to serve them with interest-based ads without parental notice or consent, in violation of COPPA.

The FTC’s settlement requires the defendants to notify and obtain verifiable parental consent for any child-directed app or online service they operate that collects personal information from children under age 13. They also are prohibited from using or benefitting from any data previously collected from children, and must destroy such data. In addition, the settlement levies a $4 million civil penalty, a large portion of which is suspended upon payment of $150,000 but will be reinstated if the defendants are found to have misrepresented their financial condition.

The Commission voted 4-1 to accept the agreement, with Commissioner Noah Phillips dissenting. Commissioner Phillips argued that the $4 million penalty was too large, and that from a standpoint of harm, “HyperBeard app users (children, we presume) viewed advertisements based on the collection of persistent identifiers. Under the COPPA Rule, that is something but it is not everything.” FTC Chairman Joe Simons countered that “the goal of the civil penalty should be to make compliance more attractive than violation. Said another way, violation should not be more profitable than compliance.” He added, “[c]ivil penalties will be an ongoing discussion here at the FTC as we attempt to do justice and achieve meaningful relief for consumers.”

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 23, 2026, the UK Information Commissioner's Office released new guidance clarifying the use of the new recognized legitimate interest lawful basis for processing personal information under UK data protection law.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page