The Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”) recently released requirements regarding data protection audits, titled “Administrative Measures on Compliance Auditing of Personal Information Protection” (the “Measures”). The Measures will go into effect on May 1, 2025.
The Measures were promulgated in accordance with the Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) and Administrative Regulations on the Security of Network Data. The Measures set forth the: (1) conditions that would trigger an audit of a data handler’s compliance with relevant personal information protection legal requirements; (2) selection of third-party compliance auditors; (3) frequency of compliance audits; and (4) obligations of data handlers and third-party auditors in conducting compliance audits. An Appendix to the Measures, titled “Guidelines on Personal Information Protection Compliance Auditing” (the “Guidelines”), contains additional compliance audit requirements.
Voluntary and Mandatory Compliance Auditing
The Measures will require data handlers that process the personal information of more than 10 million individuals to conduct compliance auditing at least once every two years.
The Measures will permit cyberspace administration and other relevant authorities to request data handlers to conduct third-party audits where:
- the data handler’s processing activities pose a great risk to the rights and interests of individuals;
- the data handler lacks sufficient security measures;
- the data handler’s processing activities may infringe on the rights and interests of a large number of individuals; or
- the data handler experiences a data breach that results in the leakage, tampering, loss or destruction of the personal information of more than one million individuals or the sensitive personal information of more than 100,000 individuals.
For the above scenarios, the data handler will need to complete a compliance audit in accordance with the Measures’ requirements and submit an audit report to the data handler’s competent authority, with any requested corrections submitted within 15 business days to the authority.
Additionally, the Measures specify that data handlers may conduct compliance audits on a voluntary basis, either internally or through the use of a third-party auditor.
Specific Requirements for Certain Types of Data Handlers
Pursuant to the Measures, data handlers processing the personal information of more than one million individuals will need to designate a person in charge of the protection of personal information (referred to herein as the “Designated Data Protection Personnel”). Data handlers providing key online platform services with a significant number of users and a complex business model will need to establish an independent organization consisting mainly of external members to monitor compliance audits.
Requirements for Third-Party Auditors and Designated Data Protection Personnel
Third-party auditors will be required to be equipped with audit staff, premises, facilities and funds appropriate to the services provided, and to protect the confidentiality of data reviewed during compliance audits. Additionally, third-party auditors will be prohibited from using subcontractors.
The Measures will prohibit data handlers from using the same third-party auditor (or its affiliates) or the Designated Data Protection Personnel to conduct compliance audits on the same subject more than three times in a row.
Guidance on Compliance Audits
The Guidance will require data handlers to evaluate the following factors in compliance audits:
- the legal basis for processing the personal information;
- the relevant personal information processing rules;
- whether the data handler has fulfilled its individual notification obligations;
- the data handler’s joint processing activities;
- the vendors processing personal information on the data handler’s behalf;
- whether there has been a transfer of personal information due to a merger, reorganization, separation, dissolution, bankruptcy or other reason;
- whether the data handler has shared personal information with other data handlers;
- whether the data handler engages in automated decision-making activities;
- whether the data handler publicly publishes personal information (including instances in which the data handler obtains individuals’ consent to do so);
- whether the data handler has installed surveillance devices that may be used to identify individuals in public places;
- whether the data handler processes sensitive personal information;
- whether the data handler processes personal information of minors under 14 years old;
- whether the data handler transfers personal information outside of China;
- how the data handler complies with the right to erase personal information;
- how the data handler protects the rights of individuals in its processing activities;
- how the data handler responds to individuals’ data protection inquiries and explains its personal information processing activities;
- the data handler’s internal management policies and operating procedures;
- the technical security measures the data handler has implemented to protect personal information;
- the data protection education and training programs provided by the data handler to its workforce;
- the performance of the Designated Data Protection Personnel;
- whether the data handler conducts personal information protection impact assessment where required;
- the data handler’s incident response plan and its implementation of the plan; and
- for data handlers providing key online platform service with a significant number of users and a complex business model, the data handler’s social responsibility report on personal information protection.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- Age Appropriate Design Code
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Audit
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Behavioral Advertising
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Department of Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DORA
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Electronic Protected Health Information
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- European Union
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- Financial Data
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Geolocation Data
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- HIPAA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- Iowa
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OCPA
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Online Behavioral Advertising
- Online Privacy
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Profiling
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Sensitive Data
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code