Chinese State Council Releases Opinion on Personal Data Protection
Time 2 Minute Read

On August 8, 2013, the State Council of the People’s Republic of China released its “Opinions Regarding Facilitating Information Consumption and Boosting Domestic Demand” (Guofa [2013] No. 32, the “Opinions”). The Opinions provide guidelines for encouraging the development of the “consumption of information” in the next few years. “Consumption of information” is a recently-coined Chinese term that encompasses the demand for, and possession, processing and reproduction of, information.

The Opinions are intended to implement certain general requirements set forth in last December’s Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Strengthening the Protection of Information on the Internet, by (1) actively promoting the promulgation of laws on network information, security and personal information protection; (2) clarifying Internet service providers’ obligations regarding the protection of personal information; (3) formulating personal information protection standards; and (4) urging that service providers be regulated with regard to the collection, storage and use of personal information.

The Opinions contain fairly brief, general suggestions for the protection of personal information. Although the Opinions are more of a policy statement and are not legally binding (like the earlier draft amendment to the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests), they may be significant in light of the fact that they were issued by the State Council. The State Council is the Chinese government’s equivalent of an executive branch; it includes China’s Premier and nine other very high-ranking members of the government who, in practice, also are high-ranking members of the Communist Party of China. The Opinions indicate that this key government authority remains aware of the need to enhance the protection of personal information, and also may suggest that legislative and regulatory activities for the protection of personal information are forthcoming.

Read additional coverage of China’s efforts to strengthen the protection of personal information.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page