EDPB Releases Statement on the Digital Services Package and Data Strategy; Calls for Ban on Targeted Ads
Time 3 Minute Read

On November 18, 2021, the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”) released a statement on the Digital Services Package and Data Strategy (the “Statement”). The Digital Services Package and Data Strategy is a package composed of several legislative proposals, including the Digital Services Act (“DSA”), the Digital Markets Act (“DMA”), the Data Governance Act (“DGA”), the Regulation on a European approach for Artificial Intelligence (“AIR”) and the upcoming Data Act (expected to be presented shortly). The proposals aim to facilitate the further use and sharing of personal data between more public and private parties; support the use of specific technologies, such as Big Data and artificial intelligence (“AI”); and regulate online platforms and gatekeepers.

The EDPB’s Statement draws attention on several concerns related to the proposals, including (1) lack of protection of individuals’ fundamental rights and freedoms, (2) fragmented supervision, and (3) risks of inconsistencies.

With respect to the lack of protection of individuals’ fundamental rights and freedoms, the EDPB highlights specific issues and makes recommendations directed toward the European co-legislator, including, notably:

  • that the AIR must prohibit the use of AI systems that categorize individuals based on biometrics (such as facial recognition) according to ethnicity, gender, political or sexual orientation, or other prohibited grounds of discrimination, and must prohibit any other AI systems whose scientific validity is not proven or that conflict with essential EU values. In addition, the AIR should include a ban on the use of AI to infer emotions of individuals or for the automated recognition of human features in publicly accessible areas.
  • that the DSA should regulate online targeted advertising more strictly and push for less intrusive forms of advertising that do not require any tracking of user interaction with content. Particularly, the EDPB recommends a phase-out of targeted advertising, leading to a prohibition of targeted advertising based on pervasive tracking. The EDPB also advocates for a general prohibition of the profiling of children.

In addition, the EDPB highlights the risk of parallel supervision structures as a result of these proposals and recommends that each proposal clearly set out how the new supervisory body called for in the proposal should cooperate with other authorities, including with existing data protection supervisory authorities.

Finally, the EDPB calls on the European co-legislature to resolve any ambiguities and inconsistencies with the existing data protection framework created by the proposals. The EDPB requests further clarification to ensure that existing data protection rules are not affected or undermined by the various proposals and that data protection rules will prevail where personal data is processed.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 24, 2026, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 2225, an Act regulating artificial intelligence companion chatbots.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page