Reporting from Washington, D.C., Hunton & Williams partner Frederick Eames writes:
Elections have consequences. What are the consequences of the 2012 election on U.S. federal privacy, data security and breach notice legislation? We outline some key developments in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate and explain how these developments might affect legislative priorities and prospects for the 113th Congress beginning in 2013.
U.S. House of Representatives
Three committees in the U.S. House of Representatives have jurisdictional claims to privacy, data security and breach notice legislation: Energy & Commerce, Financial Services and Judiciary. Over the years, the Energy & Commerce Committee has been by far the most active on these issues, and we expect that to continue to be the case.
Representative Mary Bono Mack (R-CA) has chaired the Energy & Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade for the past two years and has been a strong proponent of data security and breach notice legislation. However, Representative Bono Mack lost her re-election bid. The other Republican on the Committee most involved with these issues, Representative Cliff Stearns (R-FL), lost in the primary election earlier this year. Representative Stearns has chaired the Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Next in seniority on the Committee is Representative Lee Terry (R-NE), followed by Representatives Tim Murphy (R-PA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Michael Burgess (R-TX). It is unclear how full Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) will allocate the subcommittee chairmanship assignments. Either way, whoever chairs the Subcommittee next year likely will have an outlook favorable to industry positions on data security and breach notice legislation. It is less clear whether such legislation will continue to be a priority, though it does have bipartisan support. We do not expect the Committee to take up comprehensive privacy legislation, but we would not rule out a review of specific industry practices that have garnered media attention, such as behavioral advertising or the efficacy of industry opt-out and self-regulatory structures. The Energy & Commerce Committee has jurisdiction over the Federal Trade Commission and could be prompted to exercise oversight should the FTC’s privacy-related agenda become more aggressive.
On the Financial Services Committee, both the chairman and the ranking Democrat are set to change. We expect Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) to replace Representative Spencer Bachus (R-AL) as Committee Chairman, and Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) to take Representative Barney Frank’s (D-MA) slot as Ranking Minority Member. While Representatives Bachus and Frank were far apart ideologically, it would be hard to imagine two members further apart than Representatives Hensarling and Waters on substance or in temperament. A place where the Committee’s jurisdiction could be exercised is in attempting to rein in regulatory expansions brought about by the Dodd-Frank Act, including the ramping up of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. President Obama’s victory and a slightly expanded Democratic majority in the Senate temper how effective such efforts may be.
Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) appears to be in line to chair the House Judiciary Committee, as current Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) is term-limited. Representative John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) is expected to continue as ranking Democrat.
U.S. Senate
Like the House, three Senate committees have exercised jurisdiction over privacy, data security and breach notice legislation: Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Commerce, Science and Transportation; and Judiciary. Of note, we expect that some committee ratios will change in the next Congress, reflecting that there will be two more Democrats and two fewer Republicans in the body. The Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Judiciary Committees currently have two more Democrats than Republicans, but the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee has only one.
The Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee has been the quietest of the three committees in recent years on data security and privacy issues, and has been less active in passing legislation than in raising jurisdictional issues as the other committees have attempted to move legislation to the Senate floor (a fact cheered by many in industry). We do not expect a significant change in this dynamic. Chairman Tim Johnson (D-SD) is expected to retain his position. The ranking Republican will be Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID), taking over for term-limited Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL). Expect Democrats to make room on the Committee for Senator-elect Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who rose to political prominence proposing tighter bank regulation and consumer financial regulation.
The Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee has been the most active jurisdiction on data security and privacy issues. It is clear that under Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), that will continue. In October, Rockefeller wrote to nine companies that use and sell consumer data, under the Committee’s investigative authority, asking from whom they buy and to whom they sell data. That investigation will continue into 2013. Rockefeller’s Committee was not able to pass data security and breach notice legislation during this Congress, which was a source of some frustration to the Chairman. In early 2011, Senator John Kerry assembled a privacy bill, but that initiative never attracted enough support to grow into an effort involving the full Committee. With the Obama Administration earning four more years at the polls, signaling a strong continued focus on privacy issues by the FTC and Department of Commerce, we expect that the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will, at a minimum, reinforce and amplify that focus, though its adoption of comprehensive privacy legislation still seems a remote possibility. The Committee will have a new ranking Republican, Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), who ran his own market research company prior to being elected to Congress.
The Judiciary Committee is the only Senate committee in the 112th Congress to have passed data security and breach notice legislation. No major changes in the Committee’s leadership are expected: Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and ranking Republican Chuck Grassley (R-IA) are expected to remain in their posts.
Search
Recent Posts
- Website Use of Third-Party Tracking Software Not Prohibited Under Massachusetts Wiretap Act
- HHS Announces Additional Settlements Following Ransomware Attacks Including First Enforcement Under Risk Analysis Initiative
- Employee Monitoring: Increased Use Draws Increased Scrutiny from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- Health Information
- HIPAA
- HIPPA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Regulation
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code