EU Agency for Fundamental Right’s Report on GDPR in Practice: Experience of Data Protection Authorities
Time 2 Minute Read

In June 2024, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (“FRA”) published a report on the experiences, challenges and practices of data protection authorities (“DPAs”) when implementing the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) (the “Report”). The Report was requested by the European Commission ahead of their 2024 GDPR evaluation report, which was published on July 25, 2024.

The FRA Report highlights the challenges that DPAs face when implementing the GDPR, despite the increasing scale and complexity of their work. A majority of DPAs stated that they had inadequate resources to carry out their functions. The FRA concluded that the DPAs’ independence, supervisory function, advisory function and cooperation function are all directly or indirectly affected by the availability of human, financial and technical resources.

As detailed in the Report, individual complaints to DPAs have increased and take up a large proportion of their work. Due to having inadequate resources to meet the high demand, DPAs often found that they had to prioritize responding to complaints over their other functions and were not always able to provide independent oversight and contribute to the activities of the European Data Protection Board.

Additionally, DPAs have received new obligations under emerging digital regulations which have expanded their roles, such as new obligations under the Digital Services Act. The FRA’s research also revealed that DPAs feel unprepared when it comes to regulating new technologies such as AI. Some of the key issues highlighted were the lack of time to research new technologies and insufficient financial resources to hire specialists with technical expertise in emerging technologies, such as AI or blockchain.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 24, 2026, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 2225, an Act regulating artificial intelligence companion chatbots.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page