Federal District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss a Class Action Alleging Impermissible Sharing of Personal Information Under the Video Privacy Protection Act
Time 2 Minute Read
Categories: U.S. Federal Law

On October 8, 2014, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted Cartoon Network, Inc.’s (“Cartoon Network’s”) motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging that Cartoon Network’s mobile app impermissibly disclosed users’ personally identifiable information (“PII”) to a third party data analytics company under the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”).

Cartoon Network’s mobile app allowed consumers to view video content via their mobile device. Each time a user accessed the mobile app, the app would disclose the user’s Android ID and “a complete record of the user’s video history” to a third party data analytics company that specialized in tracking users across mobile apps and websites. An Android ID is a “randomly generated number that is unique to each user and device.” According to the complaint, the disclosures of customers’ viewing records occurred without consumer consent and violated the VPPA.

In granting Cartoon Network’s motion to dismiss, the court stated the information disclosed to the data analytics company was not PII and thus, there was no violation of the VPPA. The VPPA defines PII as “information which identifies a person as having requested or obtained specific video materials or services from a video tape service provider.” According to the court, an Android ID (coupled with video viewing history) is not PII because it does not identify a specific person. Although the plaintiffs alleged that the analytics company was able to connect specific individuals to Android IDs provided by Cartoon Network through information obtained from other sources, the court dismissed the complaint stating that the analysis focuses on the information disclosed, not on what the recipient is able to do with the information.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 3 Minute Read

The results are in: attorneys are filing more employment law cases in court.  Indeed, year-end reporting from legal databases like LexMachina confirm that the pace of filing new employment discrimination cases reached its highest level in 2025, surpassing 20,000 new filings nationwide.  Though overtime and minimum wage lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have continued to decline since 2015, discrimination cases under laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are on the rise.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 5, 2026, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed Alabama House Bill 161, the App Store Accountability Act, establishing age categorization, age verification and parental consent requirements for mobile application marketplace providers operating in Alabama, effective January 2027.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page