NIST Generative AI Profile Highlights Actions for Addressing Data Protection Risks Associated with Generative AI
Time 2 Minute Read

In April 2024, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) released an initial draft of its AI Risk Management Framework Generative AI Profile. As we previously reported, NIST released the AI Risk Management Framework (the “AI RMF”) in January 2023, providing a set of guidelines for organizations to ensure the trustworthy and responsible use and development of AI systems. Profiles are companion documents to the NIST AI RMF that provide context on how companies can put the RMF into practice in a specific sector or across sectors. NIST’s Generative AI Profile is an example of a cross-sector profile.

The Generative AI Profile defines a group of 12 risks that are novel to or exacerbated by the use of generative AI. NIST identified data privacy, information security and information integrity as three of the key risks relating to generative AI. NIST provides a set of actions to help organizations govern, map, measure and manage these risks consistent with the AI RMF.

Examples of actions companies can take to address the risks associated with generative AI as outlined in the Generative AI profile include:

  • Aligning generative AI use with applicable laws and policies, including those related to data privacy;
  • Defining and communicating organizational access to generative AI through management, legal and compliance functions;
  • Disclosing use of generative AI to end users;
  • Defining acceptable uses for generative AI systems, where some applications may be restricted;
  • Conducting impact assessments or reviewing past known incidents and failure modes to prioritize and inform risk measurement;
  • Curating and maintaining high-quality datasets that are accurate, relevant, consistent and representative;
  • Conducting periodic audits and monitoring AI-generated content for privacy risks and addressing any possible instances of sensitive data exposure; and
  • Considering using synthetic data, as applicable, to train AI models in place of real-world data, in order to match the statistical properties of real-world data without disclosing personally identifiable information.

To read more and view the full set of actions, please see the Generative AI profile. NIST accepted public comments on the profile until June 2, 2024.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 24, 2026, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 2225, an Act regulating artificial intelligence companion chatbots.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page