Time 2 Minute Read

The Texas Attorney General’s Office joined the recent swell of regulatory and judicial scrutiny into privacy issues related to connected cars, driving data and telematics, launching an investigation on the data practices of several car manufacturers. 

Time 1 Minute Read

On June 18, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission announced its referral of a complaint to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) against TikTok and its parent company regarding their compliance with a 2019 privacy settlement. The complaint is related to the FTC’s investigation into potential violations of the  Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) and the FTC Act.

Time 6 Minute Read

On June 18, 2024, the US Securities and Exchange Commission announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. for violating the internal controls and disclosure controls provisions of the federal securities laws in relation to RRD’s response to a 2021 ransomware attack.

Time 4 Minute Read

On May 24, 2024, Governor Tim Walz signed H.F. 4757 into law, enacting the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. The MNCDPA will take effect on July 31, 2025. 

Time 2 Minute Read

In April 2024, the National Institute of Standards and Technology released an initial draft of its AI Risk Management Framework Generative AI Profile. This blog entry provides a summary of the Generative AI Profile.

Time 5 Minute Read

On June 17, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in Zellmer v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 22-16925, (9th Cir. June 17, 2024) affirming the Northern District of California’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Meta and dismissing the action for lack of standing. Clayton Zellmer, an individual who had never used Facebook, brought claims against the social media company under the Illinois Biometrics Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), alleging that Meta had improperly obtained his biometric data from photos Zellmer’s friends had uploaded to the platform. Zellmer alleged that Facebook’s “Tag Suggestions” feature, which created a “face signature” using photos of Zellmer, violated Sections 15(a) and 15(b) of BIPA by collecting, using, and storing his biometric identifiers without first obtaining his written consent or establishing a public retention schedule. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit held that “face signatures” are not biometric information or identifiers, and thus are not subject to BIPA.

Time 4 Minute Read

On June 7, 2024, following a public consultation, the French Data Protection Authority published the final version of the guidelines addressing the development of AI systems from a data protection perspective.

Time 3 Minute Read

On May 23, the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Data, Innovation, and Commerce approved a revised draft of the American Privacy Rights Act (“APRA”), which includes significant changes from the initial discussion draft.

Time 1 Minute Read

The Centre for Information Policy Leadership at Hunton Andrews Kurth, in partnership with WeProtect Global Alliance, held a series of interactive workshops on digital age assurance as part of its Children’s Privacy Project. They are seeking interested professionals to join their working groups as part of several workshops.

Time 2 Minute Read

On May 16, 2024, the Illinois House of Representatives passed S.B. 2979, following the bill’s passage in the Illinois Senate in April.   S.B. 2979 would amend the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act definitions and limit liability for businesses with multiple duplicative BIPA violations that relate to the same individual.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page