On March 1, 2020, the Provisions on the Governance of Network Information Content Ecology (the “Provisions”) took effect. The Provisions govern China’s network information content ecology—including content producers (the “Producers”), content service platforms (the “Platforms”), content service users (the “Users”), industry organizations and Departments of Cyberspace Administration at all levels.
Network Information Content – Categories of Information
Producers, Platforms and Users are regulated with respect to different categories of content:
- Information the state encourages be produced, copied and released (“Encouraged Information”), such as content publicizing the theory, system, principles and policies of China; highlighting economic and social development; promoting socialist core values; effectively responding to social concerns; or that enhances the international influence of Chinese culture;
- Prohibited information (“Prohibited Information”), including content that opposes principles established by the national constitution; endangers national security; harms the honor or interests of the state; propagates terrorism or extremism; undermines national unity; undermines the state's religious policies; spreads rumors or disturbs the economic and social order; disseminates obscenity, pornography, gambling, violence, murder, or terror; abets crimes, insults or slanders others; or other content prohibited by laws and administrative regulations; and
- Information that Producers should refrain from creating, reproducing or disseminating (“Information to Be Prevented”), such as content that includes exaggerated titles, hyped gossip, scandals, misdeeds; inaccurate comments regarding natural disasters and major accidents; sexual suggestions/sexual provocations which are prone to cause association with sex; blood, horror, cruelty, etc., that causes physical and mental discomfort; mass discrimination/regional discrimination; vulgar and obscene content; content that induces minors to imitate unsafe behaviors, violate social morality, or form bad habits; or other content that has adverse effects.
Network Information Content Service Platforms
Under the Provisions, Platforms are required to establish and implement a governance framework to cultivate their “network information content ecology” in keeping with the Provisions. Platforms are also encouraged to amplify the Encouraged Information, ban Prohibited Information and are mandated to prevent the spread of Information to Be Prevented.
The Provisions mandate that Platforms take appropriate measures against Producers for producing, copying or releasing Prohibited Information, including through issuing warnings, demanding information be corrected or otherwise rectified, imposing functional restrictions, suspending updates, and closing accounts (in accordance with laws and contracts). The Provisions also require that Platforms promptly eliminate illegal content, document relevant activities and report such matters to the relevant department.
Additionally, the Provisions require Platforms to, among other things, develop and provide network products and services which are appropriate for minors, strengthen the auditing and policing of displayed advertising, and establish a credit management system for user accounts (and provide corresponding services accordingly).
Network Information Content Service Users
In addition to the regulations regarding Encouraged Information, Prohibited Information and Information to be Prevented, the Provisions encourage Users to weed the information ecology online through complaints, reporting and other monitoring practices.
Additional Limitations on Producers, Platforms and Users
The Provisions prohibit Producers, Platforms and Users from related uses online, including:
- using networks or related information technology to carry out illegal acts (e.g., insulting, slandering, threatening, spreading rumors or infringing upon others' privacy;
- interfering with the presentation of information (including by disseminating or deleting certain information);
- using new technologies and applications such as deep learning and virtual reality to engage in prohibited activities;
- unlawfully manipulating online traffic and falsely registering or illegally trading account IDs; and
- engaging in illegal Internet commercial marketing activities by using the Party flag, Party emblem, national flag, national emblem, national anthem or other symbols and contents that represent the images of the Party or the State, or in the name of major national events, major days of commemoration, State organs or their staff.
Network Industry Organizations
The Provisions suggest industry organizations establish and improve industry self-regulation, formulate industrial norms, create an industry credit evaluation system and establish other evaluation-based reward and punishment mechanisms.
Departments of Cyberspace Administration
The Provisions require the Departments of Cyberspace Administration, in conjunction with other relevant departments, to establish and improve governance mechanisms such as information sharing, joint consultation and notification, and joint handling of cases; to supervise and inspect the Platforms’ performance generally, including in connection with the Provisions, and to carry out special inspections and supervision of Platforms that have problems; and to establish an account management system for Platforms’ illegal acts.
Legal Liability
Anyone violating the Provisions may suffer the relevant administrative, civil and/or criminal liabilities.
Read the Provisions on the Governance of Network Information Content Ecology (in Chinese).
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- Health Information
- HIPAA
- HIPPA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- Iowa
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Regulation
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott H. Kimpel
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code