On February 20, 2025, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) published its annual Tech Horizons Report (the “Report”), which explores four key technologies expected to play a significant role in society over the next two to seven years. These technologies include connected transport, quantum sensing and imaging, digital diagnostics and therapeutics, and synthetic media. The Report also discusses the ongoing work of the ICO in addressing data protection and privacy concerns related to the emerging technologies featured in their previous Tech Horizons reports.
The Report provides an overview of how key innovations are seeking to reshape industries and everyday life, the privacy and data protection implications of such innovations, and the ICO’s proposed recommendations and next steps. Below are examples of some of the potential privacy and data protection implications identified by the ICO, along with certain recommendations:
Connected Transport
- Connected vehicles collect extensive and wide-ranging personal data for various purposes in a “complex ecosystem” of controllers and processors. Those organizations with transparency obligations must ensure they provide clear, concise and accessible privacy notices to individuals (including passengers); however, the ICO acknowledges that providing privacy notices in the connected transport environment may be a challenge.
- Organizations should identify the correct lawful bases for processing personal data and remember that, in addition to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (“UK GDPR”), the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations also may apply in the context of connected transport and may require consent for certain activities.
- Biometric technology may be used in connected transport for purposes such as fingerprint scanners to unlock vehicles. This technology requires the processing of biometric data which must comply with the requirements to process special category data.
- When vehicles are shared, privacy concerns arise regarding access to data from previous users, such as location or smartphone pairings.
The ICO recommends embedding privacy by design into hardware and services related to connected vehicles to demonstrate compliance with the UK GDPR and other data protection legislation.
Quantum Sensing and Imaging
The ICO acknowledges that in the case of novel quantum sensing and imaging for medical or research purposes, a key benefit is the extra detail and insights provided by the technology. This could be deemed as conflicting with the principle of data minimization. The ICO states that the principle “does not prevent healthcare organisations processing more detailed information about people where necessary to support positive health outcomes,” but that organizations must have a justification for collecting and processing additional information, such as a clear research benefit.
The ICO states that it will continue to find opportunities to engage with industry in this area and to explore any potential data protection risks. The ICO also encourages embedding privacy by design and default when testing and deploying quantum technologies that involve processing personal information.
Digital Diagnostics and Therapeutics
- Organizations working in health care are a target for cyber attacks for a number of reasons, including the nature of data held by such organizations. The adoption of digital diagnostics and therapeutics will only increase this risk. Organizations engaged in this space must comply with all applicable security obligations, including the obligation to ensure the confidentiality, security and integrity of the personal information they process in accordance with the UK GDPR.
- According to the ICO, while the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and automated decision-making (“ADM”) “could improve productivity and patient outcomes,” there is a risk that their use to make decisions could “adversely affect some patients.” For example, bias is a key risk when considering AI and ADM. Organizations should use appropriate technical and organizational measures to prevent AI-driven discrimination. Another material risk is the lack of transparency regarding how AI tools process patient data. The ICO states that lack of transparency in a medical context could result in patient harm, and that the use of AI does not reduce an organization’s responsibility to comply with transparency obligations under the UK GDPR.
The ICO recommends providers implement privacy by design and ensure that any third parties they are engaged with have in place appropriate privacy measures and safeguards. In addition, providers should also ensure they follow guidance regarding fairness, bias and unlawful discrimination.
Synthetic Media
- Data protection laws apply to personal data used in creating synthetic media, even if the final product does not contain identifiable information.
- If automated moderation is used, the ICO confirms that organizations must comply with the ADM requirements of the UK GDPR.
The ICO intends to develop its understanding of synthetic media, including how personal data is processed in the context. The ICO also will work with other regulators and continue to engage with other stakeholders such as the public and interest groups.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- Age Appropriate Design Code
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Audit
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Behavioral Advertising
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Department of Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DORA
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Electronic Protected Health Information
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- European Union
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- Financial Data
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Geolocation Data
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- HIPAA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- Iowa
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OCPA
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Online Behavioral Advertising
- Online Privacy
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Profiling
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Sensitive Data
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code