All Aboard! COVID-19 Securities Suit Sets Sail, Implicates D&O Insurance
Time 3 Minute Read

In a prior post, we predicted that novel coronavirus (COVID-19) risks could implicate D&O and similar management liability coverage arising from so-called “event-driven” litigation, a new kind of securities class action that relies on specific adverse events, rather than fraudulent financial disclosures or accounting issues, as the catalyst for targeting both companies and their directors and officers for the resulting drop in stock price. It appears that ship has sailed, so to speak, as Kevin LaCroix at D&O Diary reported over the weekend that a plaintiff shareholder had filed a securities class action lawsuit against Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd. alleging that the company employed misleading sales tactics related to the outbreak.

The lawsuit alleges that the cruise line made false and misleading statements or failed to disclose in its securities filings sales tactics by the company that purported to provide customers with unproven or blatantly false statements about COVID-19 to entice customers to purchase cruises. Those allegations rely on two news articles reporting on the company sales practices in the wake of COVID-19: a March 11, 2020 Miami New Times article quoting leaked emails in which a cruise employee reportedly asked sales staff to lie to customers about COVID-19 to protect the company’s bookings; and a March 12, 2020 Washington Post article entitled, “Norwegian Cruise Line Managers Urged Salespeople to Spread Falsehoods about Coronavirus.” The lawsuit alleges that the company’s share price was cut nearly in half following these disclosures.

Most public companies targeted in securities litigation have some form of D&O or other management liability coverage. As with any event-driven securities claims, or really any insurance exposure, the ultimate coverage determination for lawsuits will turn on the specific policy language at issue. The good news for policyholders, however, is that D&O coverage is typically broad for securities-type claims like those alleged in the Norwegian lawsuit. The lawsuit is only a few days old, and it is unclear whether any of the claims will succeed. Regardless of whether any securities violations are proven, however, D&O policies can protect companies and individual insureds prior to any judgment or settlement by paying defense costs which can be substantial.

The allegations at issue in the recent lawsuit, while specific to the securities filings and alleged business practices of a particular company, are targeted at public communications, marketing efforts, sales practices, and corporate management that could be scrutinized in a variety of different industries impacted by COVID-19. In addition, it is possible that plaintiffs file suits based on other theories under federal securities laws, such as claims that a company misled investors about its exposure to the risk of a pandemic, its oversight and risk management practices, or the adequacy of its business continuity plans. As a result, this is the first but likely not the last event-driven lawsuit relating to the current situation. Having sufficient D&O coverage in place, and notifying the insurers and pursuing coverage for defense costs (or liability, if any), can be critical to mitigating risk of increased event-driven COVID-19 exposures. In addition, counsel for public companies should keep in mind the possibility of COVID-19-related securities law claims in reviewing past disclosures and in preparing future disclosures.

  • Partner

    Geoff works closely with corporate policyholders and their directors and officers to resolve high-stakes insurance disputes. He leads the firm’s directors and officers (D&O) insurance and executive protection practice.

    As a ...

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

  • Special Counsel

    A nationally recognized insurance coverage litigator, Lorie handles all aspects of complex, commercial litigation and arbitration for policyholders. Chambers-ranked and recognized as a “top 10 Super Lawyer,” Lorie has ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

In a recent opinion addressing cross‑motions for summary judgment, a Pennsylvania state court set forth a clear holding that policyholders may recover post-judgment interest under excess liability insurance policies only when the policy language expressly says so—and only when the stated conditions are met. The decision underscores the importance for policyholders to thoroughly examine the defense and payment provisions outlined in their insurance policies.

Time 6 Minute Read

Risk professionals and insurers alike continue to monitor the rapid evolution and deployment of  artificial intelligence (AI). With increased understanding comes increased efforts to manage and limit exposure. Exclusions to coverage offer insurers potentially broad protection against evolving AI risk. Most recently, one insurer, Berkley, has introduced the first so-called “Absolute” AI exclusion in several specialty lines of liability coverage, signaling an even broader effort to compartmentalize AI risk.

Time 1 Minute Read

In a recent Client Alert, Hunton insurance partner Geoffrey Fehling discusses the impact of the California appellate court decision Practice Fusion, Inc. v. Freedom Specialty Insurance Co., where the court denied coverage under a directors and officers liability policy for a software developer’s $118 million settlement with the US Department of Justice to resolve allegations that the company violated anti-kickback laws in designing and implementing sponsored alerts in electronic health records software. 

Time 3 Minute Read

We have previewed in prior posts the ways artificial intelligence is rapidly changing the way business operate, including the many ways AI has influenced the insurance market, creating both opportunities and risks for policyholders. We later highlighted, based on a recent securities lawsuit, how corporate management may be at risk for the alleged use or misuse of AI and how companies should evaluate their directors and officers (D&O) and management liability policies to ensure that they are prepared to respond to and mitigate AI-driven risks, including claims alleging that a company or its officers and directors made misrepresentations about AI.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page