Hunton Insurance Recovery Blog

As conference and national tournaments approach for various sports, college athletics are entering a financially volatile stretch of the year. Individual investors and NIL collectives are preparing to make significant investments to build next year’s rosters and secure talent from transfer portals. With those investments, however, comes a substantial risk of loss. The risk of athlete injury looms larger than most. A season‑ending injury can derail not only a team’s performance, but also the financial expectations tied to an injured athlete. That uncertainty can, in turn, discourage future NIL investments. Booster insurance has emerged as a tailored solution to address this exact risk.

In today’s unpredictable world, event cancellation insurance is essential for event organizers, artists and venues. With risks ranging from natural disasters and terrorism to health crises like COVID-19, this insurance protects against financial losses when events are disrupted. But with this coverage comes a web of legal complexities.

In football as in life, the best defense is often a good offense. But, that adage does not always play well in litigation. In Riddell, Inc. v. Superior Court, No. B275482, 2017 WL 3614305 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 23, 2017), the California Court of Appeal blew the whistle on such a tactic, holding that an insurer could not use discovery tools in a coverage dispute with its policyholder in order to prejudice the policyholder's defense in an underlying lawsuit.