Broker Potentially Liable for Inadequate Cybercoverage
Time 3 Minute Read

Earlier this week, Eustis Insurance Co. (Eustis) filed a third-party complaint against wholesale insurance broker, R-T Specialty, Inc. (R-T Specialty), after the broker allegedly failed to properly advise New Hotel Monteleone, Inc. (Hotel Monteleone) about its cybersecurity exposures and coverage that R-T Specialty was tasked to procure. The case represents another example of the exposure that might result from a failure to engage brokers and coverage counsel experienced in the risks to be insured. This potential is especially significant when it comes to cyber exposures, which are vastly different from the legacy exposures that brokers and insurers are accustomed to handling.

Hotel Monteleone experienced a cyberattack in 2013, which subjected the hotel to significant damages for fraud recovery and operational reimbursement. Following the attack, the hotel approached Eustis and requested a cyber insurance policy that would afford coverage for this type of loss going forward. Eustis had no expertise with cybersecurity issues, so it engaged R-T Specialty to assist. R-T Specialty touted itself as having expertise and specialized knowledge in the procurement of cyber insurance policies as well as an entire team devoted to cybercoverage.

R-T Specialty helped procure a cyber policy issued by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (Lloyd’s), subscribing to Ascent Cyberpro (the Ascent Policy). The Ascent Policy purported to cover the types of exposure the hotel experienced following the 2013 cyberattack. The Ascent Policy contained general limits of $3 million, but coverage was limited significantly for amounts that constitute fines or penalties. Furthermore, at no time did R-T Specialty inform Eustis that fraud recovery and operation reimbursement might be considered to be a fine or penalty, or that amounts assessed for fraud recovery and operational reimbursement might be subject to the policy’s Payment Card Industry Fines or Penalties Endorsement and its $200,000 sublimit.

In October 2014, Hotel Monteleone again was the victim of a cyberattack, subjecting the hotel to fraud recovery and operational reimbursement exposures in excess of the Ascent Policy’s sublimit. In December 2015, Hotel Monteleone sued Eustis and Lloyd’s for full coverage under the Ascent Policy. The hotel now contends in the third-party complaint that, to the extent the Ascent Policy does not provide full coverage for the hotel’s loss, R-T Specialty should make up the difference. The case is New Hotel Monteleone, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, Subscribing to Ascent Cyberpro Policy No. ASC14C00944, No. 2:16-CV-00061-ILRL-JCW, pending in the Eastern District of Louisiana. Hunton & Williams LLP will update this blog as the case progresses.

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

Congress has extended the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 through September 30, 2026 as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, a government funding package enacted in early February 2026.

Time 1 Minute Read

If recent years have taught insurance practitioners anything, it is that the most consequential coverage disputes rarely turn on novelty alone. In 2025, courts continued to resolve high‑stakes insurance disputes by returning to first principles—examining when claims are related, how losses and occurrences are defined and aggregated, and how policy language allocates risk across time and conduct. D&O coverage and other core insurance law issues again occupied center stage, while decisions in property, cyber, and liability disputes reinforced a familiar theme: policy interpretation remains the decisive factor in determining whether coverage is available in an increasingly complex claims environment. As the decisions discussed below demonstrate, 2025 confirmed that even as risks evolve, coverage disputes remain grounded in careful, policy‑specific analysis.

Time 2 Minute Read

The New York Office of the Attorney General recently reached a $500,000 settlement with a New York orthopedics practice for allegedly failing to protect patient and employee information in light of a 2023 data breach.

Time 2 Minute Read

On December 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission announced an enforcement action against Illusory Systems Inc., a Utah-based company doing business as Nomad, following a major data breach in which hackers stole $186 million from consumers.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page