Can’t Find Microchips? Insurance May Help Ease the Pain
Time 3 Minute Read

In 2020, Americans faced a shortage of toilet paper. This year, companies face a shortage of microchips. Microchips are a crucial component in a growing number of electronic products, everything from smartphones to cars and household appliances. As the shortage trickles down the supply chain, downstream businesses are now unable to obtain the microchips or other components they need to make their products. This forced companies to slow or, in some cases, totally shut down their production lines until the supply of microchips can be restored. These slowdowns and closures have led to substantial losses of income for affected businesses. Fortunately, insurance coverage is likely available for these types of business income losses.

Most commercial property insurance policies contain supply chain or contingent time element coverage. This coverage applies when a company sustains a loss of business income due to a disruption of its supply chain, including the unavailability of critical components or products. As with most coverages under commercial property policies, the supply chain disruption typically must result from some physical loss or damage to property, but when that threshold requirement is met, supply chain or contingent business interruption coverage may be broadly available. In fact, while some policies may limit this coverage to interruptions resulting from direct suppliers, others may not, and may afford coverage where any player in the policyholder’s supply chain (upstream or downstream) is disrupted by a cause of loss of a type that would have been covered had the loss or damage occurred to insured property.

This is likely the case with the microchip shortage: several microchip manufacturers suffered commonly covered physical damage to their property. First, in February, the deep freeze in Texas forced several microchip manufacturers in the state to shut down their plants. Then, in March, a fire destroyed a microchip factory in Japan. Meanwhile, a drought in Taiwan—home to two-thirds of the world’s microchip manufacturing capacity—interrupted utility service to chip manufacturers, denying manufacturers water that is essential to microchip production. Each of these three events should easily meet the threshold for physical loss or damage of the type insured under most commercial property insurance policies and thus should suffice to trigger supply chain and contingent time element coverage for customers of affected businesses.

Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused some manufacturers to slow down or stop production. Although insurers have consistently denied that COVID-19 causes property damage, some policyholders have had success in court and obtained coverage for resulting business interruption losses and many others are poised to undo adverse initial rulings at the appellate court level. As a result, there may also be coverage available to customers of manufacturers forced to close because of the pandemic.

As with any commercial insurance loss, policyholders will be best served by consulting experienced coverage counsel to help review all applicable policies, including those of third parties under which a business may qualify as an additional insured, to ensure recovery of all available insurance benefits.

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

  • Associate

    Joseph’s practice focuses on complex insurance disputes, bad faith litigation, and advising policyholders on coverage issues. Joseph has extensive commercial litigation experience, including numerous insurance-related ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

For the trucking industry, heightened pressure to transport goods in a short amount of time means that any setbacks in the supply chain pose a major risk to the carrier’s assets or expose it to liability for damages. In a recent Supply Chain Brain article, Truckers: Does Your Current Insurance Program Suffice?, counsel Jorge R. Aviles and associate Jae Lynn Huckaba provide insight into the insurance coverage options available to transportation providers to protect against these supply chain risks. 

Time 3 Minute Read

The United States Supreme Court recently accepted review of In re Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), a Fourth Circuit decision concerning “whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a ‘party in interest’ that may object to a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.” This issue, while one of first impression for the SCOTUS, has been litigated several times in the appellate courts, leading to a circuit split over the interplay between Article III and 11 U.S.C. Section 1109(b). 

Time 4 Minute Read

Major sneaker brands have capitalized on new trends in technology and social media to hype sneaker culture. As sneakers become more popular, sneaker collections increase in value, thus increasing financial exposure for collectors and other entities in the sneaker industry. One might first think of theft, authentication, fire, floods, or market valuation as the general risks associated with sneaker collections. But many sneaker companies have made headlines over the past few years with numerous lawsuits against other sneaker companies and entities with issues ranging from traditional patent battles to exhaustive fights against counterfeiters. Often overlooked by collectors and sneaker companies alike, insurance can and does play a critical role in helping both collectors and companies faced with unexpected liability related to sneaker culture.

Time 1 Minute Read

While liability for PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as “forever chemicals”—may be an emerging issue, the availability of insurance coverage for these and similar liability claims is not. “Commercial general liability,” or CGL, insurance was specifically designed to cover claims made by a company’s customers or customers of customers for resulting bodily injury and property damage. PFAS claims fit this bill. 

Continue reading this article on the Hunton Insurance Recovery Blog.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page