Cheesecake Factory’s SEC Fines Are Latest D&O Liability to Stem from COVID-19 Pandemic
Time 3 Minute Read
Categories: COVID-19, D&O

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has levied $125,000 in civil penalties on Cheesecake Factory as part of a settlement to resolve the agency’s allegations that the company made materially misleading statements to investors about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its business. While this is the first such case reported by the SEC, it is only one in a string of recent third-party liabilities companies have faced that implicate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage.

The SEC accepted Cheesecake Factory’s settlement offer, which resolves the investigation without admission of any wrongdoing. The SEC’s order, however, explains that the company “faced an unprecedented challenge to its business arising from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic” and made “false and misleading” statements about those financial challenges to investors. In particular, the SEC took issue with several disclosures about financial impact of the virus, including statements in 8-K filings that its restaurants were “operating sustainably” during the pandemic, when in reality the company was “losing approximately $6 million in cash per week” and only had 16 weeks of cash remaining.

From cruise lines to molecular diagnostics companies, we have reported at length about the new D&O liabilities companies will face as the novel coronavirus results in a surge of “event-driven” claims alleging that companies and their directors and officers and other executives and employees breached their duties to the company or violated securities laws in the context of COVID-19 exposure.

The Cheesecake Factory settlement is an example of government investigations arising from a company’s activities in response to the pandemic. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton issued a statement regarding the Cheesecake Factory settlement emphasizing the importance the agency is placing on “proactive” disclosures as the local and national response to the pandemic evolves and suggesting that the agency will continue to hold businesses accountable for failing to adequately disclose the pandemic’s impact on their business and operations.

Even in the absence of coverage for a settlement comprised solely of fines or penalties, companies can incur substantial legal fees and expenses in defending against and ultimately resolving such investigations or enforcement actions, all of which may be covered by D&O insurance. Too often, these legal fees and expenses far exceed the amount of the actual settlement. Government investigations (and the parallel securities lawsuits based on the same allegedly false or misleading statements that often accompany them) are only one of many ongoing D&O exposures companies face, which can include, among others, claims by creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders arising from bankruptcy proceedings; False Claims Act and qui tam claims relating to funds received from government assistance programs; and cyber-related claims from shareholders or customers in the event a breach or other fraud is committed by hackers exploiting COVID-19-reltaed vulnerabilities. As companies continue to react and adapt to the ongoing pandemic and associated impact on their business and operations, they should pay close attention to D&O insurance as an effective risk mitigation tool to address future COVID-19-related losses.

  • Partner

    Geoff works closely with corporate policyholders and their directors and officers to resolve high-stakes insurance disputes. He leads the firm’s directors and officers (D&O) insurance and executive protection practice.

    As a ...

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

In mid-January 2026, key Senate committees published discussion drafts of market structure legislation for comprehensive federal regulation of digital assets. The Senate Banking Committee’s version of the bill is called the “Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.”  The Senate Agriculture Committee’s version of the bill is called the “Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act.”

Time 2 Minute Read

On November 20, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a brief announcement that it filed a joint stipulation with defendants SolarWinds Corporation and its Chief Information Security Officer to dismiss, with prejudice, the SEC’s ongoing civil enforcement action against them.

Time 5 Minute Read

On September 29, 2025, staff in the SEC’s Division of Investment Management issued no-action relief for certain crypto asset custodians. Specifically, the relief will, under certain circumstances, allow SEC-registered investment advisers (Registered Advisers), registered investment companies and business development companies (collectively, Regulated Funds) to treat a state-chartered trust company as a “bank” (for custody purposes) with respect to crypto assets and related cash or cash equivalents, without fear of enforcement under the SEC’s custody rules.

Time 3 Minute Read

On July 30, 2025, the President’s Working Group on Digital Assets released its report entitled “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology.” The report champions American innovation in crypto, and “endorses the notion that digital assets and blockchain technologies can revolutionize not just America’s financial system, but systems of ownership and governance economy-wide.”

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page