Connecting The Risks: Electric Vehicles and Insurance
Time 1 Minute Read

In an article that first appeared in Electric Light & Power, Hunton & Williams attorneys Sergio F. Oehninger and Paul T. Moura discuss the growing Electric Vehicle (EV) industry and the risks posed due to the consequential strain on the power grid. As they explain, demand and investment in EVs will likely spur greater demand for supercharging stations that consume significant amounts of electricity. Urban centers and real estate owners are also expected to increase the supply of these stations in order to make these areas more attractive and accessible to EV owners, drone operators, and autonomous vehicle fleets. All of this growth will put increasing demands on electricity supply that can be difficult for businesses to control, leading to grid outages that can cause an interruption in business operations, an inability to access or restore system data, and significant losses of business income. All of this raises the question—Can businesses count on their insurance coverage to respond to the risks posed by EVs?

  • Partner

    Recognized as a leader for insurance dispute resolution by Chambers USA and recommended for his advice to policyholders by Legal 500, Walter focuses his practice on complex insurance recovery, counseling, arbitrations ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 110 to accommodate certain Automated Driving System-equipped vehicles. This action is NHTSA’s latest effort to address automated vehicles and develop corresponding national standards. NHTSA seeks public comment on the proposed changes, with the 30-day comment period closing on May 1, 2026.

Time 6 Minute Read

Over the past two weeks the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has taken notable steps in its larger effort to address and develop a uniform framework for automated vehicles (AVs). Last week NHTSA published a request for public comment on an exemption application which, if granted, would exempt certain AVs from safety requirements and enable large-scale deployment of these vehicles nationwide. This development was closely followed by NHTSA’s issuance of two notices of proposed rulemakings (NPRM), which propose to exempt AVs from specific Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). This progression suggests agency recognition of the realities of evolving technology and a corresponding willingness to take a flexible approach to the applicability of certain FMVSSs to AVs.

Time 1 Minute Read

If recent years have taught insurance practitioners anything, it is that the most consequential coverage disputes rarely turn on novelty alone. In 2025, courts continued to resolve high‑stakes insurance disputes by returning to first principles—examining when claims are related, how losses and occurrences are defined and aggregated, and how policy language allocates risk across time and conduct. D&O coverage and other core insurance law issues again occupied center stage, while decisions in property, cyber, and liability disputes reinforced a familiar theme: policy interpretation remains the decisive factor in determining whether coverage is available in an increasingly complex claims environment. As the decisions discussed below demonstrate, 2025 confirmed that even as risks evolve, coverage disputes remain grounded in careful, policy‑specific analysis.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 9, 2026, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published a notice of a public meeting to provide updates on and insights into ongoing activities regarding vehicle automation across NHTSA. The meeting will be held in person and is scheduled to take place all day on March 10, 2026.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page