Florida Issues Emergency Fraud Prevention Rule to Protect Policyholders in Wake of Catastrophic Storms
Time 4 Minute Read

Last week, just before Hurricane Milton made landfall, Florida state officials issued an emergency decree to all licensed insurance adjusters in the state to protect homeowners against “unfair and deceptive acts” and “post-storm fraud” by insurance carriers. According to The Washington Post, the Florida Department of Financial Services is requiring that all claim adjusters provide an explanation for each change they make to a consumer’s loss estimate, document those changes, and retain all versions of the estimate and identify who made those revisions. When processing claims, adjusters must also use an electronic estimating system that provides an itemized report of all damage, as well as labor, materials, equipment and supplies. Those costs should be consistent with what a contractor or a repair company in that particular area would charge.

“Property damage from Hurricane Milton will be catastrophic and may result in billions of dollars in property losses,” the emergency rule states. “Fair and transparent loss estimates and claims adjustments will be crucial to ensure Floridians are properly and fairly compensated under the terms of their property insurance contracts, while also ensuring ongoing insurer solvency after potentially momentous financial losses.”

A 2021 investigation reported that some policyholders had their claims cut by more than 80 percent by insurance companies, some without the adjuster’s knowledge or permission, following Hurricane Ian. According to the investigation, adjusters contracted by regional insurance carriers said that managers were altering their work by lowering totals, rewriting descriptions of damage and deleting accompanying photos without their approval.

This is not the first Florida law introduced to address deceptive claims-handling practices and protect consumers against bad actors. On May 31, 2023, Governor DeSantis signed three insurance bills aimed at increasing insurer accountability and transparency in the marketplace. The new emergency rule drills down on aspects of that law, focusing specifically on the behind-the-scenes process of pricing the cost of damage.

Adding complexity to insurance claims is the fact that Hurricane Milton made landfall bringing damaging winds and ocean surges just two weeks after another major hurricane, Helene, pummeled Florida’s Gulf Coast. The insurance industry is categorizing the storms as two separate events, meaning anyone who did not or could not document damage from Helene could face even greater odds that their claim will be denied if they were hit by both storms.

Tips to Maximize Your Insurance

In addition to state regulatory efforts to curb post-storm fraud, Florida policyholders can be vigilant in documenting and supporting claims in the wake of Milton. One critical step is providing insurers with a completed “proof of loss” form. Those forms generally ask for a list of the damaged property and the cost to replace or repair such property, among other details. Attorneys and claims adjusters can help coordinate these efforts to ensure all items are properly catalogued and valued.

  • Document the Damage and Loss: Policyholders should keep records for all losses suffered, including documenting all physical damage to the extent possible. Policyholders should also make certain they keep all claim-related communications, which can be helpful weeks, months, or even years later in the event of a dispute.
  • Mitigate Losses: Policyholders should take all reasonable and safe efforts to mitigate the property losses following a hurricane. Policyholders should also keep track of and document all those mitigation efforts.
  • Be on Time: Insurance policies generally place a time limit on filing claims. In fact, one of the most common reasons for denied claims is late notice to the insurer. Policyholders should read their policies carefully and submit insurance claims within the time periods identified by their policies.

Conclusion

Florida insurance officials have already recognized that “[f]air and transparent loss estimates and claims adjustments will be crucial to ensure Floridians are properly and fairly compensated under the terms of their property insurance contracts, while also ensuring ongoing insurer solvency after potentially momentous financial losses.” We will continue monitoring important regulatory updates impacting claims, but in the interim, policyholders will be well advised to take proactive steps to understand and follow their policy when submitting and supporting claims.

  • Partner

    Geoff works closely with corporate policyholders and their directors and officers to resolve high-stakes insurance disputes. He leads the firm’s directors and officers (D&O) insurance and executive protection practice.

    As a ...

  • Associate

    Olivia’s practice focuses on complex insurance litigation and advising policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Olivia represents clients in all stages of complex insurance coverage actions, with matters involving ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 7 Minute Read

For decades, homeowners and other insurance policies have included broad pollution exclusions, often referred to as a “total pollution exclusion.” In a recent decision in Wheeler v. Garrison Prop. & Cas. Ins., No. S-18849 (Alaska Feb. 28, 2025), the Alaska Supreme Court held that a “total pollution exclusion” in a homeowners insurance policy did not apply to exclude coverage for injury arising out of exposure to carbon monoxide emitted by an improperly installed home appliance. Examining the breadth of the exclusion and applying the generally held principle that exclusions are to be construed narrowly, the court thus fulfilled the policyholder’s reasonable expectation of coverage for injuries resulting from the carbon monoxide exposure. 

Time 3 Minute Read

Trading on New Zealand’s stock exchange was disrupted last week, following four straight days of repeated cyberattacks that resulted in outages affecting debt, equities, and derivatives markets.  The DDoS attack, which is said to have originated offshore, is allegedly part of a global extortion scheme that has also targeted companies like PayPal and Venmo.  With this type of cyberattack becoming only more common and sophisticated, it is vital for policyholders to focus on the host of available insurance coverage options to protect against and maximize their insurance recovery following losses from a cyberattack.

Time 4 Minute Read

On August 13, 2020, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas granted State Farm Lloyds’ (“State Farm”) motion to dismiss a claim for loss of income resulting from multiple executive orders requiring closure of non-essential businesses in Bexar County, Texas following the COVID-19 pandemic.[1] In doing so, the court admitted that courts across many jurisdictions have found “physical loss” in the absence of tangible destruction to a covered property. However, the court glossed over such analogous cases involving disease-causing agents such as E. coli, ammonia, and asbestos, where those courts found the existence of physical loss.

Time 5 Minute Read

Following the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, Tony McDade, and Rayshard Brooks, protests against systematic racism in general, and police brutality in particular, have swept the globe. These protests have largely been peaceful, but a small, fractious group of individuals has used the protests as cover to incite violence, damage property, and loot businesses. While it might be cold comfort to the affected business owners to hear that property damage is not the norm, most have insurance that protects their pecuniary interest.[1]

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page