Hunton Insurance Lawyers Advise the Oil and Gas Industry on How Insurance Mitigates Cyber-Related Risk
Time 2 Minute Read
Categories: Cyber, Industry News

In today’s interconnected society, a cyber breach is inevitable. For energy companies in particular, the threat is even more acute as cyber security improvements lag behind the rapid digitalization in oil and gas operations. One recent cyber security report stated that 68% of respondents reported that their organization experienced at least one cyber compromise. And, just last week, it was disclosed that hackers used sophisticated malware, called “Triton,” to take control of a key safety device at a power plant in Saudi Arabia. Find our analysis of this latest attack on the blog here .

For oil and gas companies, cyber risk mitigation and resilience are paramount. These goals are attainable with adequate cyber insurance and comprehensive traditional policies, such as crime, pollution liability, and general liability policies, that minimize coverage gaps when traditional pollution events and bodily injuries result from cyber-attacks.

Hunton insurance lawyers Lawrence Bracken, Michael Levine, and Geoffrey Fehling recently published an article in the American Oil & Gas Reporter that explores the biggest cyber threats facing the oil and gas industry. For example, they report that “[t]hree of the most worrisome attack vectors include manipulating stock information to dynamically change pricing information, hacking burner management systems to engineer oil tank explosions, and manipulating temperature or pressure measurements on remote plant equipment to trigger breakdowns in remote facilities. Other potential losses include plant shutdowns, service interruptions, facility shutdowns, compromised product quality, undetected spills, bodily injury resulting from equipment malfunctions, and release of personally identifiable information, trade secrets or other financial data.” Given these risks, they go on to explain how oil and gas companies can insure residual cyber risk and provide analysis of common coverage issues that oil and gas industry insureds face in securing policy benefits following a cyber event. Finally, the authors suggest best practices for minimizing cyber risk and supply chain disruption moving forward. A copy of the article is available here.

  • Partner

    Andrea helps companies navigate disasters and swiftly recover insurance funds to restore operations with minimal impact to the bottom line. She leads the firm’s cyber insurance practice and serves as a firmwide hiring partner.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 6 Minute Read

On November 21, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service published four proposed rules to amend the Endangered Species Act implementing regulations. Generally, the Services propose to reinstate language from the first Trump Administration’s 2019 regulations in provisions concerning interagency section 7 consultation, criteria for listing species and designating critical habitat, protections for threatened species, and exclusions from critical habitat designation.

Time 9 Minute Read

On November 20, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of the Army issued a notice of a proposed rulemaking to update the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act for consistency with the US Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency and to clarify key terms for implementation.

Time 4 Minute Read

In 2025, California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington proposed fashion accountability bills to impose environmental due diligence requirements on high-earning businesses in the fashion industry.

Time 9 Minute Read

On September 30, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued Sierra Club v. FERC, which upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) authorization of a 32-mile pipeline that will supply natural gas to a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) project at which TVA is replacing a coal-fired power unit with a natural gas turbine. The opinion is significant because the D.C. Circuit recognized, for the first time, that its controversial Sabal Trail opinion was abrogated by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page