Insurer Must Pay Post-Merger Defense Costs Under Merged Entity's D&O Policy
Time 2 Minute Read

Corporate policyholders should carefully consider insurance coverage implications when structuring mergers, acquisitions, or other transactions that may impact available insurance assets. A New Jersey federal court recently granted summary judgment for a surviving bank asserting coverage rights under a D&O policy issued to an entity that dissolved in a statutory merger, based in part on the wording of the parties' merger agreement structuring the transaction in accordance with the New Jersey Business Corporation Act ("NJBCA").

In so holding, the court refused to permit the insurer to deny coverage for post-merger defense costs incurred in connection with a pre-merger shareholder class action lawsuit, rejecting the carrier's argument that the insurer's duty to defend the original policyholder's officers and directors extinguished when the policyholder dissolved and merged into the surviving entity. The court stated that "[u]nder the NJBCA, the surviving corporation of a merger in essence steps into the shoes of the merged entity for the purposes of the merged entity's rights and liabilities," including with respect to the merged entity's insurance policies.  Accordingly, the court held that "an insurance contract must contain specific exclusionary language to prevent a transfer of rights to the surviving entity under the NJBCA."  No such exclusion existed in the policy, so the transfer of assets in the merger preserved the surviving entity's insurance rights.  The court's unpublished opinion, in BCB Bancorp, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance, No. 13‑1261 (D. N.J. Sept. 18, 2017), can be found here.

The insurance rights of a surviving entity are inherently fact-specific and largely depend on the facts of the underlying claim, the policy language, and the structure of the underlying transaction under applicable state law. Retaining experienced coverage counsel early in the deal process can help maximize insurance assets and mitigate risk of uncovered claims following the transaction.

  • Partner

    Geoff works closely with corporate policyholders and their directors and officers to resolve high-stakes insurance disputes. He leads the firm’s directors and officers (D&O) insurance and executive protection practice.

    As a ...

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

In a recent opinion addressing cross‑motions for summary judgment, a Pennsylvania state court set forth a clear holding that policyholders may recover post-judgment interest under excess liability insurance policies only when the policy language expressly says so—and only when the stated conditions are met. The decision underscores the importance for policyholders to thoroughly examine the defense and payment provisions outlined in their insurance policies.

Time 2 Minute Read

Google recently resolved two cases—one by verdict and one by settlement—involving allegations regarding the control that Google promised to give users over Google’s use of their data. 

Time 3 Minute Read

On September 2, 2025, two class actions were filed in federal district court alleging that defendants digital advertising platforms Xandr, Inc. and Index Exchange, Inc. violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by unlawfully intercepting wire communications for the purpose of violating the Department of Justice’s Bulk Data Transfer Rule.

Time 5 Minute Read

On February 27, 2027, in Chabolla v. ClassPass Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a split 2-1 decision, held that website users were not bound by the terms of a “sign-in wrap” agreement.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page